<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\nTRANSLATE THIS PAGE:<\/span>
(can also use orange tab – zoom out page)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n Summary 04<\/a>
\n front page<\/a>
\n Table of Contents, in English<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n(previews<\/a>)
\n reasons<\/a>, decoys<\/a>, targets<\/a>, untouchables<\/a>
\n opposite\/misleading<\/a>, contradictions
\n national perspective<\/a>
\n consequences<\/a>
\n signs of nwo<\/a>, democracy lost <\/a>, -2-<\/a>
\nacquire wealth<\/a>
\nok, not ok<\/a>
\nexaggerations cause hatred<\/a>
\neffects of the EU<\/a>
\n control<\/a>
\n conflicts<\/a>, sanctions<\/a>, border conflicts<\/a>, uprisings<\/a>, refugees<\/a>
\nEU Soviet Union<\/a> comparison
\n Summary 05<\/a>
\n Summary<\/a> (in Swedish)
\n All posts<\/a>\n<\/div>\n
<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Earlier posts<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[ snowleopard.info, on the web since 2017 ]\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
Politicians, newspapers, banks and corporations have joined against the people.<\/strong> National politicians act against their own countries to make them dysfunctional and easy to control. Mass immigration, feminism and division into groups according to sex, race, religion, sexual orientation, diet and more are used to create conflicts in the population.<\/strong> Therefore people can not raise joint demands on the politicians who thereby can continue to be controlled by big corps through f.ex the EU. The large distance to EU HQ in Brussels makes it possible for politicians to hide and make themselves inaccessible to the people.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The breaking of borders, destruction of individual cultures and mass immigration are crucial to this process. Small homogeneous countries want to control theselves. <\/mstrong>People in small countries work together to improve whereas the countries of unions must be kept weak not to cause uprisings.<\/strong> <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Creating a mosaic society of differnt groups will impede people from raising joint demands. Mass immigration will introduce other groups with other prioritized goals, maybe just as reasonsble as sending money to their families in their hone countries. It takes long time for an immigrant to learn the basic political structure of his\/her new country and deveop an association with the country and wish to start improving it.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Globalization and international contacts are good. What is bad is when control<\/strong> is exerted from a distsnce.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
It is not racist to oppose mass immigration, by the way. The reason to oppose it is that it makes it possible for a dictatorship to instigate division and conflicts in the population to continue its tyranny. Few people care about skin color.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The political parties fake conflicts and cooperate:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The left<\/strong> will create chaos, instigate mass immigration which leads to conflicts<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The right<\/strong> will protect the rich, privatize and create conflicts with immigrants.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The green<\/strong> in Europe will support green dictatorship\/EU and oppose oil and nuclear energy to weaken European countries so they will not have the strength to become independent from the EU.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Sweden is currently run by a socialist gov’t using a budget compiled by the right. With a socialist gov’t the people <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[SPOILER]
\nwwr: 78292883<\/a>
\nN\u00e4r socialister styr med borgerlig budget har alla gr\u00e4nser suddats ut. Partierna har f\u00f6renats mot folket.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Vi f\u00e5r socialistiskt kaos med massinvandring som skapar konflikter och f\u00f6rhindrar att folket kan st\u00e4lla gemensamma krav p\u00e5 politikerna.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
H\u00f6gern kan privatisera, skydda de rika och accentuera konflikter med invandrare.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
De gr\u00f6na har fortfarande inflytande och mots\u00e4tter sig effektiva former av energi som kol, olja och k\u00e4rnkraft. D\u00e4rf\u00f6r h\u00e5lls landet svagt och kan styras av EU. Glad svart Jul! \u00f6nskar EU<\/strong> Inte m\u00e5nga k\u00f6r julbelysning p\u00e5 normal styrka i energikris.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Med socialistiskt styre och budget hade vi i alla fall kunnat beg\u00e4ra r\u00e4ttvis f\u00f6rdelningspolitik. Med borgerligt styre hade samh\u00e4llet fungerar och det funnits “poliser p\u00e5 gatorna”. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Under socialistiskt styre med borgerlig budget f\u00e5r vi det s\u00e4msta fr\u00e5n alla v\u00e4rldarna.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/em>
\n[\/SPOILER]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
International conflicts are faked in the same way to hide the common leadership<\/strong> and to make people hesitate to visit abroad.\n<\/div>\n
\n
Summary 04 (00100)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The New World Order<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Part 010<\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThis page is under construction.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Much of the material on this page is treated in more detail in other parts of the blog. All is not linked. Please use the search function at the bottom of each page.<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Table of Contents<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Introduction<\/div>\n
[ A summary of the blog snowleopard.info<\/strong> on the networks controlling the world. ]%<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\nAn international network of large corporations and news media now control most politicians and countries.<\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Democracy has fallen and public elections can no longer influence policy. Control is deep and include courts, police and other authorities.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Borders between countries are being broken down.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe most obvious proof is news media. Almost all newspapers<\/strong> and websites you can reach by e.g. Google present the same news with the same conclusions.<\/strong> E.g. many people did not believe that Russia committed attacks with nerve gas in an English town in 2018 or that president Assad of Syria attacked his own people with nerve gas. (Ad. Sep. 2020, “Putin uses Novichok again, against critic Navalny” Who believes that? The world’s most dangerous substance, killrate 1\/5. Used during 1. Russian election 2. Russian soccer WC 3. Belarus election) But those interpretations were the only ones presented in almost all major media. (Some media, like Russia Today, are edited to present a moderated, alternate picture and were in this case opposing the main agenda. But for most main events the interpretation is the same in all media.)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Most news media also evaluate actors after their person and not their actions. E.g. will Trump, Putin and Boris Johnson be criticized almost regardless what they do. This proves that news media are biased.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
It is also obvious that the politicians are not in control since elections do not change policy<\/strong>. News paper owners, editors, government officials, bank executives, big enterprise CEO:s will all stay the same after an election.\n<\/div>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
News media will only give good press coverage to poor politicians<\/strong> who make bad decisions that make the country weak and chaotic. Good politicians on the other hand would get support from the people and democracy would function. The people would then elect good politicians and the government would be strong as would national unity. But news media can only control poor politicians and therefore support them.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The poor politicans are influenced to privatize<\/strong> and put the country in debt<\/strong> to control it by networks of big enterprise.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[ poor politicians<\/a> ]<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
To control the governments, news media constantly exaggerate crises<\/strong>, like the climate or Covid-19 to put pressure on the governments to take measures that are too costly or otherwise difficult.<\/strong> This keeps the governments in the hands of the news media. Leading politicians are also bought through board posts, ambassador posts etc. A media frenzy can depose a politician.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[ crises and destruction<\/a> ]<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Another reason for news media to exaggerate crises is to increase spending which leads to governments’ borrowing<\/a> of money which makes them dependent on international actors lending them money. The money borrowed to “resolve the crisis” is then used to buy political power.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Politicians no longer represent their voters. The voters have been split up in groups with opposing interests. Creating conflict<\/strong> between groups is the most important mechanism used to control people. When groups fight eachother they can not unite to raise democratic demands. Instead of promoting cooperation between groups the networks promote conflict.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The global networks always try to sabotage unity and cooperation, e.g. between men and women or native population and immigrants. Newspapers promote mass immigration<\/strong> that create ethnic conflicts and they split up men and women by promoting feminism<\/strong>. When conflicts arise the networks blame the part they attack by labeling like “racist” or “misogynist”. Youth revolt, like the destructive Chinese cultural revolution is promoted e.g. by Greta Thunberg.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/div>\nThe networks also create conflicts between the peoples of different countries. For example they fear Nordic unity and try to split up<\/a> the Nordic countries.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The networks try to break up what fits together and introduce elements that do not fit. This is how chaos and hatred is produced. The global networks could never take over what works well so they try to split up and break down. All this is apparent from reading how the newspapers choose and slant their information.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
As globalist take over continues, conflicts between groups increase. The people are taught to hate their own country and national debt rises.<\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
News media use mass immigration, feminism, youth revolt and other dividers to take over control from the democratic system. News media can only control a country when it can create opposition and conflicts between groups. The politicians will then face opposition no matter their action.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
What fits together is broken up by demanding extreme equality<\/strong> instead of respecting differences. Any difference is interpreted as oppression to promote hatred. Men and women are different and must naturally have equal opportunities but can never be similar.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The networks and the press do not primarily build their own argumentation. They look for weaknesses in systems that function well. They do not argue on topics, they focus on people, not arguments.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The press spread vague information that can be interpreted differently in different contexts. News media reserves the right to decide which interpretation is correct for the time being. Vague information creates conflict between groups.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
News media promote mass immigration, feminism and youth revolt.<\/strong> This leads to conflicts between ethnicities and also between the sexes. Professional Internet trolls spread conflicts in social fora. These conflicts impede unity among people and democratic demands can not be raised on politicians. It is an example of “divide and conquer<\/strong>“. Since all political parties work for the same masters, they do not try to compete and achieve individual success. Personally they must all be respected and rewarded for their work. But professionally they must present different ideas for people to choose.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\nFeminism, mass immigration and youth revolt are only tools. As described in this blog women are expendable when they encounter true globalist values like Catal\u00e1n\/UN, mining or Bahta\/US sports organizations. Immigrants are suddenly not entitled to good information when an insurance company<\/a> is their counterpart.\n<\/div>\n
The networks can tell us that homosexuals and vegetarians are better than others. They will twist gender identity. Women and people with dark skin are presented more favorably in media images. They argue against strict drug legislation. The networks will promote any ideas that destabilize society.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The networks will use any possible sign of weakness to attack a country. Soros tells Swedish people that they are not solidaric to promote debt. Swedish people like to help so we are told we house refugees (to create ethnic conflicts, like in many other countries). We like low hierarchies so we are told we oppress women (to create inter sex conflict).<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n“I am basically there to make money. I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do.<\/em>” Soros<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The true reason for Soros’ speculation is destabilization. He has exclusively applied destructive methods like shorting, hedge funding, attacks on currencies. He advocates a perpetual bond. He supports Black Lives Matter and refugees.\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n
Every possible way of lowering the peoples’ self esteem and appreciation of their country is used. Preferably hitting against the strong points of a country: Obama sold out the crewed US space program to the Russians. The sports interested Russians were attacked with unfounded doping allegations, starting with the film Icarus. The well organized societies of Sweden and other Nordic countries were broken up by mass immigration. EU is trappped in Corona debt. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
By relativizing all values and norms news media can question the actions of anyone. “Solidarity<\/strong>” is used to gain financial power to redistribute wealth and gain acceptance for immigrants. “Environment<\/strong>” is used to force others to obey legislation and take financial control.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe European Union is a new Soviet Union built right in front of our eyes. The networks and news media often claim the EU is the only actor able to deal with environmental problems like the climate, and therefore resources and decisions should be transferred to Brussels.\n<\/div>\n
The strong euro currency produces financial debt in the Mediterranean countries since they can not devaluate. Therefore northern European countries must bail them out. In the long run, northern European countries must be broken and made function poorly and unproductively so that differences in the strength of currencies will not split countries in loan takers and holders <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The borders between countries have been broken down. The new frontier is between news media\/politicians\/corporations and the people.<\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
International networks are now in control. Democracy has been replaced by technocracy. News media, big enterprise and government have become the enemies of the people.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
post<\/a>\n<\/div>\n