\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\nTRANSLATE THIS PAGE:<\/span>
(can also use orange tab – zoom out page)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n
<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n Summary 04<\/a>
\n front page<\/a>
\n Table of Contents, in English<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n(previews<\/a>)
\n reasons<\/a>, decoys<\/a>, targets<\/a>, untouchables<\/a>
\n opposite\/misleading<\/a>, contradictions
\n national perspective<\/a>
\n consequences<\/a>
\n signs of nwo<\/a>, democracy lost <\/a>, -2-<\/a>
\nacquire wealth<\/a>
\nok, not ok<\/a>
\nexaggerations cause hatred<\/a>
\neffects of the EU<\/a>
\n control<\/a>
\n conflicts<\/a>, sanctions<\/a>, border conflicts<\/a>, uprisings<\/a>, refugees<\/a>
\nEU Soviet Union<\/a> comparison
\n Summary 05<\/a>
\n Summary<\/a> (in Swedish)
\n All posts<\/a>\n<\/div>\n
<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Earlier posts<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[ snowleopard.info, on the web since 2017 ]\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
TITLE<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
see also [ climate theory origins<\/a> ]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
** Al Gore, Nobel Prize, 2007
\nNorth polar<\/a> ice cap completely melted during summer in the near future, water levels will rise 2m in the near future, probability of this 75% <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
** Al Gore: in his 2006 global warming documentary “An Inconvenient Truth,” Gore predicted that the global sea level could rise as much as 20 feet “in the near future.” Fox<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
** UN environment meeting Stockholm 1972, maurice strong<\/a>, 10 years<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
** Ehrlich 1969:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
“everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
** Guardian review<\/a>
\n[SPOILER]
\nN\u00e4r man kritiserar Greta brukar man ju p\u00e5peka att en ton\u00e5ring inte har det historiska perspektiv som kr\u00e4vs f\u00f6r att bed\u00f6ma klimatteorierna. H\u00e4r \u00e4r \u00e4nnu ett bevis p\u00e5 detta<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\u201cThe Gulf Stream has changed its course<\/strong>,\u201d the piece from 25 January 1890<\/strong>, reported. \u201c\u2026 This change, we are told, has been in operation for two years, and as a consequence New England has almost forgotten the rigours of winter.\u201d<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
theguardian.com<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
1957 Guardian article titled \u201cPossible melting of polar ice-caps,\u201d<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Heder \u00e5t The Guardian. En stor, mycket spridd “main stream”-tidning. Men den v\u00e5gar publicera en del artiklar som inte \u00e4r helt i linje med “agendan”. Britisk kultur innefattar en viss sj\u00e4lvironi.
\n[\/SPOILER]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
** “GOODBYE TO THE GLACIERS”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Glacier National Park had to change these signs in 2020
\n $\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[SPOILER]
\nwwr: 79149479<\/a>
\nP\u00e4r Holmgrens f\u00f6ruts\u00e4gelse liknar hur USA:s myndigheter f\u00f6rutsp\u00e5dde hur glaci\u00e4rerna nu borde ha f\u00f6rsvunnit i denna nationalpark. Man fick byta en del skyltar f\u00f6r n\u00e5got \u00e5r sedan.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
“Goodbye to the glaciers”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
youtube.com<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Det enda som verkar f\u00f6rsvinna \u00e4r MP.<\/em>
\n—-
\n[\/SPOILER]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
** Nimoy 1978 ref<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
**<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a>
Al Gore receiven the Nobel peace prize in 2007: “The northern polar ice cap will be gone in seven years.” – (Swedish major daily Aftonbladet) — https:\/\/www.aftonbladet.se\/nyheter\/a\/Kv8ELE\/nordpolens-is-borta-om-sju-ar<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
** Greta<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
“den enade vetenskapen \u00e4r \u00f6verens att det \u00e4r 11 \u00e5r till till en irreversibel kedjereaktion som sannolikt blir slutet f\u00f6r v\u00e5r civilisation”. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
red ice<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Thunberg s\u00e4ger i sin nya bok, \u201dRunt 2030 kan vi ha satt ig\u00e5ng en irreversibel kedjereaktion utanf\u00f6r m\u00e4nsklig kontroll som kommer att leda till slutet av v\u00e5r civilisation som vi k\u00e4nner den.\u201d\u201d
\n klimatupplysningen<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Thunberg says only \u2018eight years left\u2019 to avert 1.5\u00b0C warming
\n clcn<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Vi kommer ju att f\u00e5 se ett av de allra sista Vasaloppen n\u00e5gonsin, innan sn\u00f6n f\u00f6rsvinner f\u00f6r gott, enligt meteorologisk expertis, s\u00e5 det m\u00e5ste vi ta tillvara p\u00e5.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Sn\u00f6n p\u00e5 v\u00e4g att f\u00f6rsvinna f\u00f6r alltid<\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Publicerad 5 dec 2006 kl 07.08<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Om tjugo \u00e5r har stora delar av Sverige gl\u00f6mt hur man \u00e5ker skidor och Vasaloppet \u00e4r ett minne blott. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Det tror tv-meteorologen P\u00e4r Holmgren. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
P\u00e4r Holmgren befarar att Vasaloppet inte \u00f6verlever sitt 100-\u00e5rsjubileum 2022<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[P\u00e4r Holmgren, meteorolog och numera medlem av Europaparlamentet. –ed]
\n<\/em>
\n—-
\nexpressen.se<\/a>
\n ku<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
—-
\nStabilt sn\u00f6djup i Vasaloppssp\u00e5ret under 100 \u00e5r
\n15 februari, 2022
\nArtikel fr\u00e5n SLU<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
forskning<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
2020:
\nHolmgren om Vasaloppets framtid: \u201dHade tyv\u00e4rr r\u00e4tt\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\u2013 Just i \u00e5r kommer det s\u00e4kert g\u00e5 att genomf\u00f6ra Vasaloppet, delvis p\u00e5 grund av konstgjord andning och teknik. Men jag har h\u00f6rt att m\u00e5nga f\u00f6rs\u00f6ker s\u00e4lja sina biljetter f\u00f6r att de inte har haft m\u00f6jlighet att tr\u00e4na, s\u00e4ger P\u00e4r Holmgren.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
expressen<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Sn\u00f6djupet stabilt i Vasaloppssp\u00e5ret under 100 \u00e5r
\n slu<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\u201dJag fick en fr\u00e5ga f\u00f6r ett antal \u00e5r sedan: \u2019vad skulle du g\u00f6ra om du var statsminister?\u2019 Och d\u00e5 svarade jag att jag skulle snabbt avskaffa alla val. F\u00f6r att det jag ser framf\u00f6r mig nu, det \u00e4r ungef\u00e4r en lika stor utmaning som ett tredje v\u00e4rldskrig. Och d\u00e5, om man h\u00e5rddrar det lite d\u00e5, s\u00e5 har vi liksom inte tid att h\u00e5lla p\u00e5 och k\u00e4bbla mellan partierna till exempel.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Ovan citat \u00e4r h\u00e4mtat ur veckans Korseld och det \u00e4r TV-meteorologen och klimatdebatt\u00f6ren P\u00e4r Holmgren som yppar orden. Han mildrar f\u00f6rvisso sig sj\u00e4lv sedan. Ist\u00e4llet f\u00f6r demokratins avskaffande f\u00f6rordar han slutligen en \u201dv\u00e4ldigt, v\u00e4ldigt bred block\u00f6verskridande regering\u201d. Men att han ens talar om att avskaffa val \u00e4r \u00e4nd\u00e5 symptomatiskt f\u00f6r hur l\u00e4tt klimadebatten \u00f6verg\u00e5r i tosserier.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
SvD<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Green representative in the European Parliament, meteorologist P\u00e4r Holmgren predicted there would be no snow in Sweden in the 2020’s, but his party colleagues in government approved a Swedish application for the winter Olympics in 2026
\n—-
\nStockholms ans\u00f6kan om OS 2026
\nIdrottsminister Amanda Lind (MP) uppger att regeringen ger OS-ans\u00f6kan den n\u00f6dv\u00e4ndiga s\u00e4kerhetsgarantin.
\nDet vore fantastiskt f\u00f6r Sverige om det blev ett olympiskt spel, s\u00e4ger idrottsminister Amanda Lind (MP) till TV4.
\n—-
\n svd<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
* “Starving polar bears”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Many of us watched the viral video<\/a> in horror. A starving polar bear scavenging for food on barren land, his ribs visible beneath a jaundiced white coat.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\u201cThis is what climate change looks like,\u201d said National Geographic.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The video remains the most viewed on National Geographic\u2019s website\u2014ever.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
But some scientists accused National Geographic of being loose with the facts. There was no way of knowing that climate change was the sole cause of the animal\u2019s starvation, they contended; it may have been merely ill or old. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
New Yorker<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Starving-Polar-Bear Photographer Recalls What Went Wrong<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Editor’s Note: National Geographic went too far in drawing a definitive connection between climate change and a particular starving polar bear in the opening caption of our December 2017 video about the animal. …<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Perhaps we made a mistake in not telling the full story\u2014that we were looking for a picture that foretold the future and that we didn\u2019t know what had happened to this particular polar bear.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
ng<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
In fact, though polar bears were placed under the protection of the Endangered Species Act in 2008 over concerns that its Arctic hunting grounds were being reduced by a warming climate, the polar bear population has been stable for the last three decades.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
In 1984, the polar bear population was estimated at 25,000. In 2008, when polar bears were designated a protected species, The New York Times noted that number remained unchanged: \u201cThere are more than 25,000 bears in the Arctic, 15,500 of which roam within Canada\u2019s territory.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
New estimates from the International Union for Conservation of Nature show a mid-point estimate of 26,500 (range: 22,000 to 31,000) in 2015. In The State of the Polar Report 2018, zoologist Susan J. Crockford says updates to IUCN data put the new global mid-point estimate at more than 30,000.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Even accepting the lower figure, the estimate is the highest since the polar bear became internationally protected in 1973.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
fee<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Melting Ice Threatens Polar Bears’ Survival
\nDecision to put bears on federal endangered species list is imminent<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
whoi<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
still, in 2022, ADOPT A POLAR BEAR
\n wwf<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
* rising water levels<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
MachDiamonds: 79113469<\/a>
\nDet \u00e4r satellitm\u00e4tningar som visar 3.2mm\/\u00e5r, man b\u00f6rjade m\u00e4ta med satellit p\u00e5 90-talet. Tidvattenm\u00e4tare visar n\u00e4rmare 1.5mm\/\u00e5r och det har de gjort i typ 200 \u00e5r.<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
*<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
2000:
\nDe senaste 12 \u00e5rens milda vintrar liknar 1930-talets. Men medan regn och sn\u00f6 vr\u00e4kt ned under 80- och 90-talsvintrarna var 30-talsvintrarna ganska torra.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
nt<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
* acidification of lakes and forests was a big issue in the 80’s, now not much is said about it<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
* “oil will be gone in 30 years” has been said for a long time<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
* ozon hole was a real threat and was solved quickly<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
*<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
February 19, 2018
\nTop Climate Scientist: Humans Will Go Extinct if We Don\u2019t Fix Climate Change by 2023<\/strong> … A top climate scientist is warning that climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years<\/strong>. … In a recent speech at the University of Chicago, James Anderson \u2014 a professor of atmospheric chemistry at Harvard University<\/strong> \u2014 warned that climate change is drastically pushing Earth back to the Eocene Epoch from 33 million BCE, when there was no ice on either pole. … Anderson\u2019s assessment of humanity\u2019s timeline for action is likely accurate, given that his diagnosis and discovery of Antarctica\u2019s ozone holes led to the Montreal Protocol of 1987. Anderson\u2019s research was recognized by the United Nations in September of 1997. He subsequently received the United Nations Vienna Convention Award for Protection of the Ozone Layer in 2005, and has been recognized by numerous universities and academic bodies for his research.<\/strong> … Anderson is calling for a Marshall Plan-style endeavor in which all of the world takes extreme measures to transition off of fossil fuels completely within the next five years. … This has do[sic] be done, Anderson added, within the next five years. \u201cThe chance that there will be any permanent ice left in the Arctic after 2022 is essentially zero,\u201d Anderson said<\/strong>, with 75 to 80 percent of permanent ice having melted already in the last 35 years. … As Grit Post reported in July of 2017 [http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200714211319\/https:\/\/gritpost.com\/new-report-emissions-25-companies\/], more than half of all carbon emissions between 1988 and 2016 can be traced back to just 25 fossil fuel giants around the world. 10 of those 25 top emitters are American companies, meaning the onus is largely on the United States to rein in major polluters like ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Marathon Oil. Other offenders include Chinese companies extracting and burning coal, and Russian oil conglomerates like Rosneft, Gazprom, and Lukoil.<\/strong> — http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200714211319\/https:\/\/gritpost.com\/humans-extinct-climate-change\/ — linked by Greta Thunberg [https:\/\/twitter.com\/GretaThunberg\/status\/1009757391515156480] : “A top climate scientist is warning that climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years.” — https:\/\/gritpost.com\/humans-extinct-climate-change\/<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
“A top climate scientist is warning that climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years.”
\ngritpost<\/a>
\n Twitter<\/a> Greta Thunberg, June 21, 2018<\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n $\"\"$ <\/a>\n
Fb<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
* 2016: Germany bans combustion engines from 2030. 2023: Germany refuses to ban compbustion engines from 2035.
\n snowleopard<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
%%%%%<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The climate crisis is just one crisis in a continuous chain of crises<\/a> designed mostly to maintain the global dictatorship. It may develop into one of the more powerful, though.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
It is obvious how these crises are invented and not appear by themselves. F.ex, Bill Gates bought pharma stock and held a TED-talk in 2015<\/a> on pandemics, well before Covid appeared and society responded with disproportionate strength.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
origins<\/a> of the climate theory<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…
\nFurther evidence the “crisis” is constructed<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
* EU does the opposite and uses Corona funds to increase production and CO2
\n* Nuclear power is not promoted
\n* Energy crisis in Europe gives high prices and EV use is discouraged
\n* Biden makes Saudi increase oil productiona and opens new oilfields and pipelines
\n* Big Oil is not required to use profits for “climate improvement”
\n* consumption is not curtailed<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
Another obvious sign the climate theory is fake is that no one is doing anything.
\nNo politician is doing anything.
\nNo corporation is doing anything. Gates builds hydrogen powered yacht and Microsoft pledges to capture all carbon it ever emitted. But we still have to buy a new computer every 3-4 years due to intentional downloading of the system by Windows updates.
\nNo one asks the oil companies to fund carbon reduction.
\nAlmost no private person is doing anything. (commute together, holiday by train, reduce consumption, eat vegetarian)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Carbon dioxide is connected to almost every human activity and global authorities can use it as a pretext to control anything. Not even the lowest emitters are protected from interference. The EU constantly attacks the Nordic countries. Finland and Sweden have the most forest of European countries and therefore are helpful in the climate crisis. But Nordic countries are attacked by the EU claiming mismanagement of forest industry. Even carbon can be considered useful if it serves political purpose. Sometimes Australian coal is considered useful since it is claimed to emit less CO2 than Chinese coal.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The EU Covid recovery funds proved that the climate theory is fake. Only one of the funds raised in 2020-21 collected \u20ac750 bn to “kick start” Europe. This was done in a situation where Covid had reduced CO2 emissions drastically but the EU did then not make any considerations of the increase in emissions caused by “kick starting” production. Not even “green” spending was required.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The climate theory is only used for political manipulations, not for improving the environment. The EU wishes to protect European companies and tries to raise CBAM CO2 trade barriers against China quoting CO2.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Greta Thunberg proves that the climate theory is fake. She claims a severe crisis is at hand but
\n* does not take nuclear energy into account
\n* never issues specific demands, only worsens the panic by extreme predictions
\n* seldom criticizes corporations
\n* does not demand that oil companies use their profits to improve the environment
\n* does not take the population explosion in the third world into account
\n* does not demand that private persons reduce consumptions<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Greta mainly yells at politicians to create panic.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The alleged climate crisis is only part of a green scam where global organizations like the EU construct a problem they claim to be the only one able to solve. Taxpayers and national governments must send their money to the EU so they can save the world from disaster. It is just a variation of the old doomsday prophecies.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Carmaker Tesla is part of this. It only sells few cars, similar to e.g. Volvo but its stock valuation is higher than any other car maker! The stock price is inflated by artificial means to give an impression that stock buyers believe that a green transition is going to take place. But the situation works in reverse: Stock is not high because people believe in a green transition. Stock is manipulated<\/em> to be high to make us believe<\/em> a green transition will take place. Boss Elon Musk is treated like a rock star and opposition is controlled and always fails (Bezos: moon lander, Rivian, Kuiper).<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
EU constantly invents crises to motivate the existence of the organization. Euro crisis, refugee crisis, exaggerated response to Covid are just other crises exaggerated or invented by global organizations like the EU. The climate crisis is just another of these invented crises.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
When the peak of the Covid response seemed to be over the EU presented its next crises: cold war with Russia over Ukraine and energy crisis. Commodity prices are already high in Europe. Petrol is more than twice as expensive as in the US, and now both petrol and electricity prices are sky rocketing. The aim of the EU is to weaken the European countries so they will not threaten the rule of the EU. Reducing mobility through high gas prices and bringing down citizens’ abilities to communicate by high electricity prices isolate European people.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
November 2021, one of the coldest<\/a> November for a long time<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
…<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
wrong again<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970,
\n aei<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
realclimatescience<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
forbes<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
wwr: 73684195<\/a>
\nVi j\u00e4mf\u00f6r ju ofta Gretas profetior med tidigare utsagor. Jag tror inte denna varit med:
\n[B]New York Times 1969:[\/B]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B]Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989[\/B]<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
twitter.com<\/a><\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
ehrlich<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
r\/climateskeptics<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Gore: \u201cScientists . . . have warned that there is now a 75 percent chance that within five years the entire [North Polar] ice cap will completely disappear during the summer months.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
google books<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Copenhagen<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
$\"\"$ <\/a>
https:\/\/www.aftonbladet.se\/nyheter\/a\/Kv8ELE\/nordpolens-is-borta-om-sju-ar<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
Mrbosun: 69675432<\/a>
\nAl Gore d\u00e5 han mottog Nobels fredpris 2007 – “Nordpolens is borta om sju \u00e5r”
\nAftonbladet<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Seg j\u00e4vla is den d\u00e4r Nordpolsisen som v\u00e4grar att f\u00f6rsvinna till klimatalarmisternas och
\nAl Gores f\u00f6rtrytelse. Greta och Al Goore -jiisses :whoco5:<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Al Gore has said that \u201csea level could be rising as much as 20 feet in the near future.\u201d That quote comes from Gore\u2019s 2006 Oscar-winning movie \u201cAn Inconvenient Truth.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
bp<\/a>
\n sl<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
2007 Nobel Peace Prize: Gore\/IPCC<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Men hon drar ett tungt lass. P\u00e5 70-talet trodde ju WaPo och g\u00e4nget p\u00e5 snar istid ist\u00e4llet. Greta m\u00e5ste v\u00e4l innerst inne f\u00f6rst\u00e5 att hon bara spelar en roll.
\n johnlocke.org<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Programmet \u00e4r riktigt kul att lyssna p\u00e5! (Det kanske har varit med f\u00f6rut i tr\u00e5den.)
\nMr Spock fr\u00e5n Star Trek st\u00e4ller huttrande sitt vetenskapliga rykte (i rollen) bakom och l\u00e4ser texten.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
youtu.be<\/a>
\n[B]Edit \u00e4ndrade l\u00e4nken.[\/B]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
1970 \u2013 Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age \u2013 Scientists See Ice Age In the Future (The Washington Post, January 11, 1970)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
1970 \u2013 Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century (Boston Globe, April 16, 1970)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
1970 \u2013 Pollution Called Ice Age Threat (St. Petersburg Times, June 26, 1970)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
1970 \u2013 Dirt Will Bring New Ice Age (The Sydney Morning Herald, October 19, 1970)<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
wedonthavetime: 68882332<\/a>
\nGreta kan eventuellt f\u00e5 mycket att f\u00f6rklara i framtiden.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B][I]Warming fears are the \u201cworst scientific scandal in the history\u2026When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.\u201d[\/I][\/B] \u2013 UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B][I]\u201cThe IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn\u2019t listen to others. It doesn\u2019t have open minds\u2026 I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists.\u201d \u2013 [\/I][\/B]Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B][I]UN IPCC Scientist Kenneth P. Green Declares \u2018A Death Spiral for Climate Alarmism\u2019 \u2013 September 30, 2009 \u2013 \u2018We can expect climate crisis industry to grow increasingly shrill, and increasingly hostile toward anyone who questions their authority\u2019 \u2013 [\/I][\/B]Dr. Kenneth Green was a Working Group 1 expert reviewer for the United Nations\u2019 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2001<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B][I]\u201cI was at the table with three Europeans, and we were having lunch. And they were talking about their role as lead authors. And they were talking about how they were trying to make the report so dramatic that the United States would just have to sign that Kyoto Protocol,\u201d Christy told CNN on May 2, 2007. \u2013 [\/I][\/B]Alabama State Climatologist Dr. John Christy of the University of Alabama in Huntsville, served as a UN IPCC lead author in 2001 for the 3rd assessment report and detailed how he personally witnessed UN scientists attempting to distort the science for political purposes.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B][I]\u201cGore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp\u2026Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.\u201d[\/I][\/B] \u2013 [B]Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B][I]\u201cThe claims of the IPCC are dangerous unscientific nonsense\u201d[\/I][\/B] \u2013 declared IPCC reviewer and climate researcher Dr Vincent Gray, of New Zealand in 2007. Gray was an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports going back to 1990, author of more than 100 scientific publications.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
[B][I]\u201cMany [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.\u201d[\/I][\/B] – Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Den sistn\u00e4mnda kan vara anledningen till att vi inte ser s\u00e5 m\u00e5nga forskare som vill vara med uppe p\u00e5 scenen tillsammans med Greta.<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
1989: UN predicted world flooding in 10 years.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
AP News<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked
\nPETER JAMES SPIELMANN
\nJune 30, 1989<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of \u2033eco- refugees,\u2032 \u2032 threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
AP<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
glacier<\/a> national park<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Climate \u2018Experts\u2019 Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions
\n Climate Depot<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
ozone<\/a>
\nozone hole ozone depletion<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
Timbro
\nJANERIK LARSSON
\n5 SEPTEMBER 2019
\n jel<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
“Ehrlich was fake” says Timbro so in fact Ehrlich<\/a> was right about population<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Romklubbens The Limits to Growth som kom 1972.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
The Unrealized Horrors of Population Explosion
\nBy Clyde Haberman
\nMay 31, 2015
\n New York Times<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
(disinformation? diminishes population problem and puts focus on rich countris)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Quote by
\nJANERIK LARSSON, Timbro:
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
b\u00e5da kanadensarna Darrell Brickers och John Ibbitsons Empty Planet: The shock of global population decline (Crown, 2019). Bricker \u00e4r VD f\u00f6r Ipsos Public Affairs och Ibbitson \u00e4r en av Kanadas mest v\u00e4lk\u00e4nda och respekterade journalister. Han \u00e4r verksam p\u00e5 Globe and Mail, den kanadensiska kvalitetstidningen. Boken utvecklar p\u00e5 ett l\u00e4ttl\u00e4st och v\u00e4lskrivet s\u00e4tt sitt resonemang om de problem som en del fokuserat p\u00e5: en fortskridande \u00f6verbefolkning.<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Den ena \u00e4r att FN-prognoserna om v\u00e4rldens kommande \u00f6verbefolkning (Ehrlich i ny tappning) sannolikt \u00e4r helt felaktiga eftersom de allra flesta tecken pekar p\u00e5 att v\u00e4rldens befolkning efterhand kommer att krympa.<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Tidigare i \u00e5r skrev professorerna Carl E Olivestam och Rune Wingblad en f\u00f6rsynt h\u00e5llen artikel i Svenska Dagbladet d\u00e4r de resonerande kring det faktum att vi \u00e5ter \u2013 inte minst i Sverige men ingalunda bara h\u00e4r \u2013 \u00e5terigen f\u00e5tt en pietistisk domedagsprofetia om att v\u00e4rlden g\u00e5r under.<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
—-
\nEnd Quote by
\nJANERIK LARSSON, Timbro<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Professorer: Klimat\u00e5ngest h\u00e4mmar utvecklingen
\nSvD<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Hans Rosling om att antalet barn i v\u00e4rlden har slutat att \u00f6ka
\n dn<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Asle Toje<\/a>, klimatprofeterna<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\nWe are made to focus on made up crises in the rich world while the population explosion is gradually building up in the third world. This is a way of creating housing crisis, famine etc in the future.<\/strong> Crises are a way to strengthen global power. Over population will give corporations an advantage in choosing labor.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
An alleged climate disaster may be used as a pretext to send another wave of refugees into Europe.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Like China this will lead to an over population problem that with time leads to a crisis that must be addressed.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
For sustainable life and to avoid over exploitation of natural resources, the population must naturally be kept low.<\/strong> But global networks promote overpopulation to create scarcity, competition and hatred in the population. Ehrlich<\/a> wrote about the risks but in a way where he intentionally put himself forward as a lunatic.\n<\/div>\n
wwr: 78766717<\/a>
\nMusk<\/strong> tillh\u00f6r bara etablissemanget som forts\u00e4tter att m\u00f6rkl\u00e4gga hotet om \u00f6verbefolkning.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Greta<\/strong> n\u00e4mner aldrig \u00f6verbefolkningens bidrag till det p\u00e5st\u00e5dda klimatproblemet.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Hans Rosling<\/strong> m\u00f6rklade problemet med \u00f6verbefolkning.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Ehrlich<\/strong> var tidig att tala om befolkningsexplosionen. Men sedan gl\u00f6mdes denna bort. Ehrlich svartm\u00e5lade medvetet sig sj\u00e4lv med en del \u00f6verdrivna profetior, \u00e4ven om milj\u00f6.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Greta har redan f\u00f6rklarat att klimatet \u00e4r en kamp mellan norr och s\u00f6der.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Den troliga forts\u00e4ttningen \u00e4r kuslig. Inga klimat\u00e5tg\u00e4rder har genomf\u00f6rts. Politikerna planerar att p\u00e5st\u00e5 att vi nu br\u00e4nt de fattiga l\u00e4nderna och deras befolkningen kommer att v\u00e4lla in som klimatflyktingar fr\u00e5n s\u00f6der. Den massinvandring vi s\u00e5g i samband med USA:s krig var bara b\u00f6rjan p\u00e5 den totala apokalypsen.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Al Gore ingick i planen. Han lurade oss att stirra p\u00e5 Nordpolens is. Men den sm\u00e4lte aldrig och det kom ingen flodv\u00e5g av sm\u00e4ltvatten fr\u00e5n norr. Men medan vi stirrar p\u00e5 Nordpolen och skrattar \u00e5t Gore kommer vi att bli \u00f6versk\u00f6ljda av en flodv\u00e5g av klimatflyktingar fr\u00e5n s\u00f6der.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Detta kommer att kombineras med hungersn\u00f6d. Bill Gates \u00e4r nu USA:s st\u00f6rste \u00e4gare av odlingsmark. (L\u00e5ngt innan Corona k\u00f6pte han l\u00e4kemedelaktier) WFP fick Nobelpriset 2020. Snabbk\u00f6pen k\u00f6r “stoppa matsvinnet”.<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
2006: 78766835<\/a>
\nMalthusianism<\/strong> \u00e4r en nationalekonomisk och statsvetenskaplig teori som g\u00e5r ut p\u00e5 att befolkningen \u00f6kar mycket snabbare \u00e4n produktionen av mat och matresurserna.<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
wwr: 77718603<\/a>
\nSandraHson: 77718300<\/a>
\nja i b\u00f6rjan p\u00e5 den videon
\nredice.tv<\/a>
\n\u00e4r n\u00e5gra minuters klipp med GRETAS tal, exempelvis:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
“den enade vetenskapen \u00e4r \u00f6verens att det \u00e4r 11 \u00e5r till till en irreversibel kedjereaktion som sannolikt blir slutet f\u00f6r v\u00e5r civilisation”. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Med mera ovetenskapligt svammel. Blandat med hennes hot mot “er”.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Stackars GRETA, vilket uppvaknande, att v\u00e4rlden inte g\u00e5r att styra som hon gjorde med malena o svante.<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
och 10 \u00e5r var det 1972 enligt Gretas kollegor vid FN:
\n slowfox.files.wordpress.com<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
och det skulle ha varit “Goodbye to the glaciers” 2020, s\u00e5 den skylten har dom f\u00e5tt sudda p\u00e5
\n adam.curry.com<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
och p\u00e5 70-talet skulle det bli ny istid
\nvid 19 minuter beskriver videon hur de planerar anv\u00e4nda k\u00e4rnkraft f\u00f6r att sm\u00e4lta isen vid nordpolen f\u00f6r att stoppa den nya istiden, men d\u00e5 kom de p\u00e5 att vattnet skujlle stiga, kanske detta gjorde att de b\u00f6rjade s\u00e4ga att det skulle bli varmt ist\u00e4llet
\nf\u00f6rsta minuten av videon \u00e4r ocks\u00e5 bra
\n youtube.com<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Greta \u00e4r f\u00f6r ung f\u00f6r att inse att dessa teorier bara \u00e4r sn\u00f6mos och har upprepats sedan l\u00e4nge utan att sl\u00e5 in. D\u00e4rf\u00f6r har hon och andra unga g\u00e5tt att manipulera. Greta \u00e4r en sk\u00e5despelerska som helt vuxit ihop med sin roll. Henne kan man egentligen inte klandra. Hon bara g\u00f6r det andra har trimmat henne till.<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
MidlifeMommy: 79201935<\/a>
\nLivet \u00e4r fullt av \u00f6verraskningar … och Google ligger bara ett knappklick bort.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
—-
\nnatverketpopulation.com<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
S\u00e5lunda p\u00e5minns vi t.ex. ofta om att den genomsnittliga amerikanska f\u00f6rbrukaren producerar 23 g\u00e5nger s\u00e5 mycket v\u00e4xthusgasutsl\u00e4pp som genomsnittsnigerianen. Vad vi inte f\u00e5r veta \u00e4r att den m\u00e4nskliga befolkningen \u00f6kar med mer \u00e4n 80 miljoner vartenda \u00e5r, till \u00f6verv\u00e4gande delen i fattiga l\u00e4nder och i synnerhet i Afrika, vars nuvarande befolkning p\u00e5 1,3 miljarder ber\u00e4knas stiga till 3 miljarder runt 2060. Och alla dessa m\u00e4nniskor vill begripligt nog konsumera mera, vilket olyckligtvis medf\u00f6r st\u00f6rre v\u00e4xthusgasutsl\u00e4pp. Afrikanska regeringar sneglar mot sina kolfyndigheter f\u00f6r att f\u00f6rse sina v\u00e4xande befolkningar med energi (Schwikowski 2021, se fotnot). Kina, som nu \u00e4r Afrikas st\u00f6rsta handels- och investeringspartner och som har Afrika som en k\u00e4lla f\u00f6r r\u00e5material, planerar koleldade anl\u00e4ggningar p\u00e5 kontinenten f\u00f6r att driva sina utvecklingsprojekt d\u00e4r (Goldstone 2021). P\u00e5 s\u00e5 s\u00e4tt kan den sv\u00e4llande skaran av fattiga i Afrika s\u00f6der om Sahara och andra fattiga, snabbt v\u00e4xande regioner bli potentiellt betydande producenter av v\u00e4xthusgasutsl\u00e4pp under kommande \u00e5rtionden.
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Sj\u00e4lv \u00e4r jag tacksam att Greta inte har n\u00e5gra superkrafter. \u00c4r ganska s\u00e4ker p\u00e5 att fattigdom, arbetsl\u00f6shet och allm\u00e4nt el\u00e4nde hade f\u00f6ljt i hennes sp\u00e5r. Och milj\u00f6f\u00f6rst\u00f6ring. Men vad g\u00f6r man inte f\u00f6r att bek\u00e4mpa ofarlig koldioxid …<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Tack!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
*
\nOm ni inte redan har sett den skulle jag rekommendera er att kolla upp tr\u00e5den “Var Greta en bluff?” under Medier & Journalistik. Den \u00e4r full av “hatare”, f\u00f6r att tala Giant.Squid<\/strong>-spr\u00e5k. Ser nog inte s\u00e5 ljust ut f\u00f6r Greta & Co att f\u00e5 ut sitt budskap fram\u00f6ver. Kanske b\u00e4ttre att k\u00f6ra vidare p\u00e5 kolonialism-sp\u00e5ret?<\/em>
\n—-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
Population<\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
Despite being one of the smallest and least populous continents, South America is the third most populous with an average of 73 people per square mile. This compares to Asia with a population density of 203 people per square mile, and Europe with 134 people per square mile. The population density of South America as a whole compares to the population density of the entire United States of 76 people per square mile.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
wpr<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n