03.1.005.001: Media: The New York Times, US East Coast

TRANSLATE THIS PAGE:

 
 

Bay of Pigs
Many believe that if The New York Times had not withheld crucial information, the failed (and for the US, embarrassing) invasion of Cuba would never have taken place.
It is very difficult to investigate situations like Watergate or Bay of Pigs. Any search using Google will be under heavy globalist agenda, in this case often protecting The New York Times.
 
Rodchenkov
The New York Times and The Washington Post contributed significantly to the ban of Russian athletes during the Olympic Games in PyeongChang in 2018. -1-  -2-  -3-
The Rodchenkov affair had notable repercussions in media over the world. Based on extremely weak evidence Russia was accused of systematic doping in sport. Jewish networks were activated: The producer of the film Icarus (of Jewish descent) contacted the New York Times (owners of Jewish descent) and the newspaper, together with the Washington Post started a spread of information where other papers followed. See “newspaper of record“. (Therefore antidoping has later been targeted by political actors.
Other similar attacks on Russia, also based on false evidence had much less impact, like “chemical weapons used by Syria”, “nerve gas attacks in UK/Salisbury”. To avoid realizing the differences between people of different ethnicities, Africans are tested harder than others for doping violations. Russian athletes must prove their innocence where others have not to.

 
Iraq
The New York Times (reporter Judith Miller) contributed significantly to making the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 happen. The evidence were false.
Continue reading “03.1.005.001: Media: The New York Times, US East Coast”

05. Methods: 5.07.01 Strävan mot konflikter, Palestinafrågan; The image of conflict, The useful enemy, The Cold War, Provocations; Media focus on the Middle East and foreign countries; Eurovision Song Contest, hets mot konflikt och krig; destructiveness

5 Metoder:

5.7  Strävan mot konflikt / Behovet av motstånd

Globalists use conflict on many levels and areas, f.ex:
Between people. If people are put in power for false reasons (like being promoted to a post by a superior wishing conflict) they do not have the skill or motive to respond accurately and will create conflict.
In forums: Using rudeness and arguments against the person in order to cover up the real topic and bring down the discussion to troll level.
Between groups of people in order to divide and conquer, women and immigrants are f.ex. supported by MSM.
Between countries like in the Skripal drama. Both UK and Russia lose. As usual only war mongers win. In creating conflict both the participating parties often lose and only the superior part wishing a cold war wins.  In this case the “Deep State” and US war machine are the winners in that cold war gives false motives for rearmament.
Continue reading “05. Methods: 5.07.01 Strävan mot konflikter, Palestinafrågan; The image of conflict, The useful enemy, The Cold War, Provocations; Media focus on the Middle East and foreign countries; Eurovision Song Contest, hets mot konflikt och krig; destructiveness”