Militarisering: Catalán, Kongo, FN-styrkor; Diskussioner om utlandet; Kampen om råvarorna; Uganda; Assange-Catalán-Kamphuis connection-The scare factor Militarisering: Kongo

The Guardian: “The wars [in #Congo] will never stop” – Well, at least not as long as the #cobaltmines don’t run dry. 18.000 UN troops protect the illegal regime fine, its mandate to rule Congo ran out in 2016! #Apple & #Tesla cheers.

The UN obstructs the murder investigation of Catalán and Sharp. Catalán had proof of Congo gov’t ordering murder but Congo gov’t is protected by UN.

Continue reading “ Militarisering: Catalán, Kongo, FN-styrkor; Diskussioner om utlandet; Kampen om råvarorna; Uganda; Assange-Catalán-Kamphuis connection-The scare factor” Militarisering: Flyktingen som vapen, “Weapons of Mass Migration” …

Migrerande gnu/wilderbeest och zebra i Masai Mara, Kenya. 4. Flyktingar som vapen – “Weapons of Mass Migration

The enemy within

Every war is waged with a strategy. The most effectual war strategy is to manipulate an enemy unknowingly so that he will destroy himself step-by-step and even, where possible, dig his own grave.” [ ref ]

Att flyktingar kan användas som geopolitiska vapen står utom all tvekan. Ghadaffi och Erdogan har, vid förhandlingar, pressat EU genom att styra flyktingströmmar. Continue reading “ Militarisering: Flyktingen som vapen, “Weapons of Mass Migration” …” (02) Iran

    — Note! —

Many conclusions on this page must be reconsidered. After evaluating the Iran-US conflict as a whole, this blog concludes it is fake. Iran is under US control and is made to play enemy in a game similar to the cold war.

Saudi oil tankers show ‘significant damage’ after attack – Riyadh
Attack on vessels, one bound for US, follow warnings Iran or proxies could target shipping

Två saudiska, en norsk, en UAE-tanker påstås skadade. Reuters påstår sig ha sett bilder, men inget offentligt. Inget oljespill.

En av saudi-tankers var på väg till US.
Continue reading “ (02) Iran” Afghanistan


The war in Afghanistan seems more and more like a fake war. Talibans have good relations with US ally Pakistan. The war has gone on for a long time. Sweden has nothing to do with it but takes part to motivate mass immigration from Afghanistan to Sweden. Strange incident with friendly fire killing Swedish soldiers and inability of the US to win the war.

Afghanistan has proven difficult to conquer for British, Russians and Americans. Strong conflicts between many groups of people makes it difficult to govern the country. Without central authority not even “divide and conquer” will work. Mountainous terrain gives advantage to guerilla warfare.

US supported the Taliban attacks against Soviet. Now Pakistani support Taliban against Afghan government.

2017 there were still 13000 foreign troops in A., officially fighting the Taliban.

The Soviet war in Afghanistan started in 1979

Basically the Afghan government called for Soviet help.

Soviet involvement was induced by the US:

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahiddin began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention [emphasis added throughout].
Continue reading “ Afghanistan” Libya; Arab Spring, Tunisia

Tha Arab Spring revolutions started in Tunisia 2010. Untest spread to Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain.
The protests were sparked by the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi on 17 December 2010[14][15][16] and led to the ousting of President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali 28 days later
Soros’ Open Society funded the main opposition voice in Tunisia, Radio Kalima, which championed the riots there that led to Ben Ali’s ouster.
Continue reading “ Libya; Arab Spring, Tunisia” Media: The New York Times, US East Coast


Bay of Pigs
Many believe that if The New York Times had not withheld crucial information, the failed (and for the US, embarrassing) invasion of Cuba would never have taken place.
It is very difficult to investigate situations like Watergate or Bay of Pigs. Any search using Google will be under heavy globalist agenda, in this case often protecting The New York Times.
The New York Times and The Washington Post contributed significantly to the ban of Russian athletes during the Olympic Games in PyeongChang in 2018. -1-  -2-  -3-
The Rodchenkov affair had notable repercussions in media over the world. Based on extremely weak evidence Russia was accused of systematic doping in sport. Jewish networks were activated: The producer of the film Icarus (of Jewish descent) contacted the New York Times (owners of Jewish descent) and the newspaper, together with the Washington Post started a spread of information where other papers followed. See “newspaper of record“. (Therefore antidoping has later been targeted by political actors.
Other similar attacks on Russia, also based on false evidence had much less impact, like “chemical weapons used by Syria”, “nerve gas attacks in UK/Salisbury”. To avoid realizing the differences between people of different ethnicities, Africans are tested harder than others for doping violations. Russian athletes must prove their innocence where others have not to.

The New York Times (reporter Judith Miller) contributed significantly to making the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 happen. The evidence were false.
Continue reading “ Media: The New York Times, US East Coast”

20.02 02 Summary (2)

A longer summary can be found here.


Regeringars agerande skadar ofta deras eget land, folk och t.o.m. regeringsmedlemmarna själva.

T.ex skadar svensk massinvandring Sverige och Skripaldramat skadar brittiskt anseende. T.o.m. regeringsmedlemmar (t.ex Boris Johnson) kritiseras för sina ogrundade uttalanden.

Det är svårförståeligt varför regeringar inte verkar för sitt eller landets bästa. Men det är inte de enskilda regeringarna som kontrollerar sina länder. Regeringarnas ologiska åtgärder kan bara förklaras med att de står under inflytande och agerar på andras uppdrag. En del av inflytandet utgörs ju uppenbarligen av media eftersom media stöder de ologiska åtgärderna (i dessa fall massinvandring resp. ogrundade anklagelser mot Ryssland) och inte genomför elementär källkritik etc.

I USA kallas detta inflytande Deep State. Det beskriver de delar av administrationen som inte arbetar för presidenten utan för att odemokratiskt försöka styra landet och utöva inflytande över presidenten.

För att förstå det politiska skeendet måste man frigöra sig från traditionella uppfattningar och inse att
1. Det finns krafter öveordnade regeringar.
2. Media styr politikerna.
3. Kallt krig är det viktigaste målet med USA:s politik, detta oberoende av orsaken till konflikten eller vem man har konflikt med. Förstår man inte ett utrikespolitiskt skeende kan det ofta klarläggas om man ser vilka konsekvenser det har för ett kallt krig och dess inverkan på upprustning.

Continue reading “20.02 02 Summary (2)”