Greta Thunberg’s true, dark motives

2. Attacking the government

News media support Greta so they can put pressure on the governments by letting Greta ask why the government is not doing enough about the climate. Greta’s attacks on governments weaken them and make them vulnerable to control by news media in other areas, like in making financial decisions.

Today’s big business has gone socialist and multinational corporations participate in breaking down borders to weaken governments. Today “woke billionaires” [-1- -2-] like Soros are socialist.

Many of today’s big businesses are not forged in competition. Google and Facebook could become dominant in a few years through influx of capital and networking. Using the same methods Greta, having no special qualifications, has become one of the world’s most famous people within one year, “building an international movement by skipping school on Fridays”. This is naturally impossible, she is just a puppet for a global network. Her performance at press conferences, not having a script, has been poor. She has theater training, knowing how to take instructions from a director. She has no scientific training.

Greta, as well as Google and Facebook have not been exposed to competition. They have been promoted by networks and capital influx creating unstable top-down controlled organizations. Greta has been chosen like a socialist leader and she promotes socialism. No one has elected Greta but news media and secret networks have given her a platform to attack democratically elected leaders. Both presidents Trump and Putin are forced to comment on her.

No action is intended to be taken against “climate change”. No reduction of consumption will ever occur. All measures are said to start in 10-30 years. Not now. The elite does not believe in climate change. It is an issue constructed to blackmail politicians

Greta’s task is not to reduce consumption. Her task is to influence politicians.

Greta’s socialist backers tell politicians: Unless you let the banks and multinationals run the country, we will send Greta for you. She will say you are a climate criminal. The media will rub this in. Then you are a goner.

The climate issue is not promoted to reduce emissions. It is promoted to blackmail democratically chosen leaders in other areas. Of course, Greta and her backers are not democratically chosen but still try to control nations.

Gretas message is highly inconsistent. She does not fly, she forbids her parents to fly! The term “flying shame” is strongly connected to her. But she also says that other people do not need to travel like she does.

I’m not traveling like this because I want everyone to do so,” she said, speaking of crossing the Atlantic in a catamaran. “I’m doing this to sort of send a message that it is impossible to live sustainable today and that needs to change. It needs to become much easier. We can’t require from everyone to rely on people like this to sail you across an ocean, that is absurd.”

knoe

This is because her message does not wish for real change. She is only a puppet set to exhort politicans in general.

Other authorities are broken down in a similar way:

Greta advocates school strike to undermine the schooling system and the authority of the teachers. Her message makes students revolt against their teachers. (But Greta’s “school strike” is a fraud. She lies outright about it. She never went on strike. School gave her permission to study at home on Fridays. But she still demands from other children to sacrifice their future by giving up education! In the same way she and news media lie about how she allegedly travels North America in “Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Tesla” whereas in fact she has been recorded using a petrol driven KIA. She seem to have had one photo-op in a parked Tesla.) Social foras connected to MSM remove criticism of these lies without reason. Criticism of Greta is labeled hate, like criticisms of mass immigration, racism and of feminism – misogyny.

Greta tells her parents how to travel and not go by air. In doing so she undermines the authority of the parents.

Greta mobilizes young people against the older, utilizing the emotional side of young people in a youth revolt.

3. Panic

“I want you to panic“

The climate doomsday scenario will create panic, especially among young people and make them more susceptible to the propaganda in her message. It will also make the news flow around Greta seem more relevant and even insignificant details will keep up the interest around her.

“Our house is on fire.”

The climate message is focused on an alleged severity of the problem, not around measures that need to be taken. Greta says “Our house is in fire. I want you to panic.” But she does not say what should be done by individuals. She only says that everyone should do ‘as much as they can’. But this is so vague that it will even increase the panic.

The Corona (Covid-19) pandemic spring 2020 shows similarities. Media report the seriousness of the matter which is vastly exaggerated. But media and health authorities do not take action. No medical resources are deployed for the endemic. Corona testing is not even available in the Swedish capital, Stockholm except for hospital in patients. No advice is given on who should apply self quarantine and who should see medicare.

Greta also self quarantines but under strange circumstances. She does not tell why she does not appear at a meeting except for ‘personal reasons’. Only later does she tell she believes she has had Corona. All adding to rumours and speculation.

This media/authority focus on crisis and not on alleviation is an attack of psychological warfare on the population both for the climate and virus matters.

The attacks will destabilize a country and make it weak. The attacks are greatly carried out by news media governed by international networks governed by the USA.

A weakened country can more easily be controlled by the intenational networks.

4. Control of nations

Greta’s propaganda often emphasizes that world leaders do not “do enough” about the climate issue. This would mean that stronger mechanisms for supranational control of nations are needed.

The dark, globalist forces behind Greta have no intent to save the world. On the contrary they try to break down national borders, disrupt the social system and create conflict between groups. In this chaos, news media can rule by supporting some groups at the expense of others.

December 12, 2019, Greta just held a speech at COP 25 in Madrid. As usual she speaks in very broad terms. She dares not tell people the obvious: to reduce consumption, in particular over Christmas.

She is said to write her own speeches. This is highly unlikely. She had social problems and needed support teacher. She is 16 years old and has never been an activist before. Her initial plan was to sit down on the street with a sign. When she has had to reply to questions without manuscript, she often has big difficulties. To sum up: She does not have the ability to write this series of professional speeches.

Paid Internet trolls defend her in a curious way. If a person questions the climate theory, trolls say the person hates Greta! (A thin, 16 y.o. girl with diagnoses was chosen to avoid criticism.)

5. US attack on Europe

The US is already attacking Europe by mass immigration of “refugees” from US warfare. The climate is another form of attack. Strong European countries are brought down by climate regulations, often enforced through the EU.

Greta’s connection to the US was e.g. seen during her trip to the UN. After her speech in New York, when media focus was still on her, she immediately went to Canada and held one of her biggest meetings ever, in Montreal. She scolded Canadian PM, Trudeau. After some time she continued to the US. Later she held some meetings there, but most publicized was probably positive news how she was given membership in an Indian tribe during interesting rituals.

The 16 y.o. activist also says that it would be a “waste of time” to talk to the president of the US, Trump!! She says that in order to spare the US from her criticism.

The US does not take responsibility for it’s refugees. Now it has appointed Trump who goes light on climate matters and wants to build a wall against refugees.

Gretas criticism mainly focus on Europe. But US, Russia, China, India, the Arab (oil producing) world are spared. Latin America is barely on the news media map, in Europe.

When Greta criticized oil production in one article, she mentioned Norway and Canada, but not the Middle East!

Her speech in US congress was much milder than her speech in EU parliament. What is mostly broadcast from the US is how Greta herself has to answer questions from members of congress.

In US congress Greta was asked what it feels when “other sailboats than hers throw more waste”. She should have answered that the US is the worlds largest CO2 emitter per person and scolded the US congress, like she does elsewhere. But she is controlled from the US and does not criticize them harshly. To save Trump from criticism she says “it is a waste of time to talk to him”!

The US 2020 primaries have started. Sanders talk about big spending on “Green Deal”. But he and Biden repeatedly make fools of themselves during the campaign, in order not to be elected.

CO2 regulations are mainly implemented by EU. Cuts in CO2 have not yet been legislated about. A distant 2050 goal has been set. But EU has been given tools of power to instruct countries how to act. The climate is a wide subject and many areas fall under EU control.

US attack Europe in many ways, like MSM, EU and refugees. MSM control politicians and thereby also EU. Moving decisions away from people to EU makes it even easier to control matters from the outside. EU regulations tie down countries. Brexit has shown that a free UK would be a threat to Europe. Merkel and Barnier has expressed this directly.

What we read about US liberalism is US export only. We read CNN, MSM. We read about Democrats impeaching Trump. We har shown bits of California and Hollywood. But this is not how the US is run, from the east coast. See: US liberalism is for export. US 2020 elections are rigged (Sanders inviting an Iranian ayatollah to speak at meeting, Biden swearing and behaving generally poorly to supporters, pretending to forget former president Obamas name (under which Biden recently served as VP for 8 years).

6. European Union

Greta speaks to the EU parliament, March 2019. They have agreed on a new climate law that is to be signed by member states. The only legally binding CO2 target is for 2050. After 2023 EU can audit member countries a d after 2030 give “recommendations”.

A target 30 years into the future is very vague. But already after 2030 the EU can issue recommendations (warnings) to member states not following the agenda. EU will be in control of how and who makes the CO2 audits and how the results will be interpreted.

Greta therefore does not want specific goals. She scolds the parliament in general for not acting earlier. But Greta does not want anyone to act. She wants countries to break the agenda so EU-commission can use this to threaten the countries in other fields using the climate audits.

The climate theories are vague and no country is willing to follow the costly climate agenda. So the EU-commission can threaten them with a climate audit with vague criteria. This becomes an instrument of power for the EU commission.

Gretas task is to keep the panic going.

The Independent

The US, India, China, Middle East do not take climate action. Neither do individual countries like e.g. Sweden or other European countries. The only part taking action for the climate is the EU. They can use climate theory to control individual countries. They need Greta to keep the climate hysteria going. (The EU also seems to be under influence of multinationals and the US.)

The European Union is the only entity spending other’s money, so they want to spend more.

It is highly significant that Greta does not attack India, China, Russia, USA, not even Sweden. She sits outside the Swedish parliament. She does not talk to president Trump because the 16 y.o. considers it “a waste of time”!

Greta’s message is connected to strengthening and expanding the European Union.

The campaign is called school strike and is strongly segregated after age. Older people Greta scolds with “How dare you!” in her speech.

Grets speaks at the UN, the World Economic Forum, the US Congress, the British Parliament, the EU, COP25 (the countries that signed the climate agreement), are questioned in the US Congress. She has meetings with, among others, Trudeau, Merkel, Obama, Corbyn and von der Leyen.

But in order to disrespect the Swedish parliament she has not yet (Sep 2020) spoken to any Swedish politicians. She spends evedy Friday outside the Swedish parliament, effectively protesting against the parliament.

With her fame there is no problem to arrange meetings with Swedish politicians. But she disrespects them in order to demote Swddish democracy and promote the EU.

7. Christian connection

The vagueness of the climate agenda resembles the Christian message that has formed the Western world. No clear evidence is available for either. They are cases of believing.

If clear evidence was available leaders would act, like the ozone hole. But now all action is compared to a vague distant goal, giving the leader the possibility to personally decide who is a good believer.

If a law was passed how much we mist reduce CO2 this year, the power of the leadership would be lost. It works like antidoping. – Surprisingly no one wants to reduce doping. They all wish to punish athletes from countries they dislike.

The same people are involved. Christianity stsrted in the Middle East. Climate theories are promoted by Jewish owned newspapers.

Christian deacon Ardin promotes Greta to prophet. Ardin is CIA, as has been described elsewhere in this blog.

8. Guilt

Imposing guilt is central in Greta’s agenda.

“You are failing us. But the young people are starting to understand your betrayal. The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us, I say we will never forgive you.” (from Greta’s UN speech)

Greta Thunberg’s entirely justified guilt trip is hitting home -1-

Spitting Image creator’s refusal to feel guilt for Greta Thunberg puppet -2-

Spitting Image

9. Masquerading politics as an environmental issue

School children are ordered to go on mandatory school strike for the environment. In fact they are made political activists for socialism and globalization. HBTQ activism is used in the same way.

The international news media network lets almost no true criticism of Greta be widely known. The few critical voices heard are decoys trying to turn the attention away from how Greta’s message paves the way for socialism. Like talking about carbon dioxide taxation. Or like connecting criticism to less pleasant people, like violent, racist car-reporter Jeremy Clarkson or similar.

10. Socialism

Greta has not been elected by any organization. She has not been chosen in competition with anyone else. She has been selected according to socialist principles. The same is true for the objectives of her message – To take control from elected world leaders.

News media promote Greta Thunberg and the global warming issue. This is not done to save the planet. On the contrary, news media and other networks do this in order to create conflict that will destabilize governments and make them susceptible to influence by news media. Other groups are used in the same way:

* Feminism attributes natural differences between the sexes to “oppression” which creates conflicts between men and women.

* Mass immigration is used to create ethnic conflicts.

* Demands from HBTQ-groups are promoted in order to pressure governments to fulfill these demand.

* Biological psychiatrists use diagnoses like ADHD to create advocacy groups. Greta is also diagnosed in this way. The diagnosis Asperger will also classify individuals with independent thinking, sometimes criticizing the system, as suffering from disease. In Greta’s case, the diagnosis also creates interest around her. In Internet foras, the trolls incessantly make up unfounded rumors (judging from pictures of her) that she is dying from starvation etc!

The same methods to classify dissidents to the system as mentally ill were used in the Soviet Union.

Greta has probably been told to fake tics in this picture. If she had these involuntarily spasms, she would not have been allowed to appear in the UN.

Regarding all these groups, news media can pressure governments for “not doing enough”, using Greta Thunberg’s words.

Actual problems, like some environmental issues, e.g. the hole in the ozone layer must be solved and everyone agrees on this. Therefore they do not cause conflict and can not be used for creating hatred in the population.

11. Three possible interpretations

1. Self-styled climate activist

This is impossible. A 15 (now 17) year old school pupil can not reach her level if success within a year, become person of the year, feature on the cover of Time and Rolling Stone. Speak in the UN, US Congress, EU etc She is not invited to the World Economic Forum to teach anything. She was invited to have publicity.

2. Actress

Greta comes from a family of artists and singers. She has theater training. Her saga has so far been a Cinderella story. The alleged almost mute girl that became the voice of a world wide climate movement.

This blog has so far considered this alternative as the true story – A child actress given a role to inspire other girls to join the climate movement.

But after a while you would then expect her to undergo the same transformation as the heroines of some Hollywood movies – Let down her hair and become a verbal, cute climate princess.

But lately, in the EU and on the cover of the Rolling Stone (graphic) she looked even more dismal than before.

Why is this? A third interpretation must be taken into account:

3. Her parents sold her to the Devil

Was Greta’s health ruined to be cast in a role to fit the agenda of the international press?

She is much thinner than her sister. Family claims Greta is stopping them from flying and eating meat:

But a young girl can not control her family.

Her Internet supporters usually says that Greta must take care of herself. But she was 15 when she became famous and is still only 17. Her parents are responsible.

Mother’s book try to focus on how she forces Greta to eat more, maybe it is the reverse, she has been slimming Greta.

It is possible Greta could have been honed for this role, by her parents, since she was very young. She could have been taught or forced to eat little, having disastrous consequences for her health. Her diagnoses could even have been used to have amphetamine prescribed which would further make her thin and also short.

Psychiatric treatment is under the influence of international networks. How you look on anorectic patients is a political matter. Psychiatrists are encouraged to focus on the patient and disregard the social context. Anorectic patients are put in a bubble and their families are not considered. They are “treated” by infusions and encouraged to eat more. All to disregard the influence of the family. (Not letting the parents take responsibility is part of a process destabilizing society. In Bjärred mental illness in parents led to their children being diagnosed with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis finally the parents murdered the children “out of mercy” and finally committed suicide. The case was never investigated.)

Greta looked the worst during her major appearances, in the UN and lately in the EU.

@GretaThunberg looked more sick than ever in #EU. Has G been abused by dieting to fit a news media role of Climate Saint. Her diagnoses might even have led to amphetamine treatment, further …

#ClimateStrike

#FridaysForFuture #schoolstrike4climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateChange https://t.co/cnPjOldQEa

… further slimming her and making her short. Did Greta’s parents sell her to the Devil for eternal fame? Was her health sacrificed to create a look that will never leave our minds?

Twitter

But if you look further on the pictures from the EU parliament she is acting.

Refusing to shake a man’s hand. As this blog has described, the climate agenda unfortunately promotes conflict between men and women by putting women before men. Many pictures from the EU show that.

EU segregates men and women. Climate is for women.

June 2020: Greta’s mother has been the driving force behind putting Greta in this role. She has long had a left political interest. She, like Greta’s advisor prof. Rockström have since long criticized Swedish nationalist party SD. Her mother, a singer, is on the cover of newspaper Vi in 2011. Rockström is also featured in the same edition. The article about the mother focuses on how much air travel she does in her work. (She later claimed she had to give up flying because her daughter forced her to.)

Spring 2020

The EU continues their plan to control Europe by setting it in debt. April/July 2020, EU approves €540/750 bn spending after Covid, to “kick-start” businesses and thereby CO2 production. Greta is blocked by media.

July 2020

Senator Tammy Duckworth, disabled in war, is part of the BLM protests. She is attacked as a “coward” by false flag Tucker Carlson and media twists her disability in the same way as they twist Greta’s alleged diagnoses. Tucker C:s attack is meant to make other criticism of Duckworth seem like irrelevant attacks on her persona.

On the contrary. As long as you attack their political message you are allowed to criticize these two world famous political characters.

July 2020

Greta practically works for oil company PR department by adding her fame to their donations of € 1 million. [ Gulbenkian foundation ] Not a word about oil in the bbc article.

food taxation

Greta’s diagnoses are used to:

1. Create interest around her

2. Create diversion from her political agenda

3. Explain why she is skinny (true reason is she starved to fit as climate poster girl)

4. Explain that her criticism of the system really depends on some “neuro-psychiatric” fault in her brain. This is Soviet style psychiatry. System critics are sent to mental asylums.

wwr: 73614479

Men det håller inte, att bara du påstår det.

Det som räknas är vilken bild Greta ger när hon intervjuas. Hon borde hela tiden påpeka i sina intervjuer att rörelsen har extremt snedvriden åldersfördelning. Även könsfördelningen är sned.

Hon driver en diskriminerande rörelse utan att göra något åt det så att folk ser att hon strävar efter att utjämna ålders och könsfördelning.

Rörelsen verkar även ha rasistiska drag. När hon träffar indianer eller samer tar hon inte upp deras klimatpåverkan.

%%%%%

Twitter, Snowleopard

April 2021

Greta declares she will not attend the climate summit in November since global vaccine distribution is skew!

Greta now proves the climate crisis is a bluff and she is just a spokesperson for global media. If she had been a climate activist she would have stayed on the climate but now she and the global press chase on to the next crisis (Covid) invented to take taxpayers’ money and transfer to multinationals, EU and other similar institutions.

Nästa:

03.1.001.003: 003 (001) Greta Thunberg (002)

Innehållsförteckning:

20.04 (00000 links) Innehållsförteckning, ToC