The true, dark motives of the people behind Greta Thunberg
Within one year, a 16 year old girl, without any other qualifications than being an activist, becomes leader of a global climate movement and is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The role of her famous parents and their connections to an advertising agency have been pointed out elsewhere. Financial connections to Gates and Soros have been shown.
She has training as an actress but no scientific background.
Experts and governments have not yet been able to come to a conclusion regarding the global warming theory. But why is Greta promoted to this high degree?
Governments have been able to address previous environmental issues, like f.ex the hole in the ozone layer and nuclear power. Why is the climate issue not approached in the same methodical way, using experts, governments and if needed referendums? Instead activism and discussions among people are supposed to resolve a complex scientific and political problem! Activism and discussions among people are important but must also be followed by government action. Why is Greta Thunberg’s activism promoted in extreme ways but governments do not act? Who benefits from Thunberg’s activism?
Today many countries are no longer independent. They are controlled by an international network. This network controls the decisions of governments through, among other mechanisms, news media and supranational organizations, like the European Union. This is clearly seen by f.ex. the difficulties for The United Kingdom to exit the EU (“Brexit”) or forming a government in Sweden 2018 since the parties were under order not to talk to a nationalist party which received a significant share of the votes.
Greta Thunberg’s rise to fame is entirely due to her backers instructing her to promote this globalist agenda. This is done through several mechanisms:
1. Divide and conquer
Greta’s extreme activism without sufficient scientific foundation will divide the population into “alarmists”, supporting her and “deniers” asking for more, scientific evaluation of the global warming theory. Splitting up a population is an efficient way to rule it. The population becomes weak when it is consumed by internal conflicts. Alarmists will support the climate agenda and in turn receive support from news media.
Greta’s hyperemotional speech in the UN without strict scientific base makes her an object for criticism. Any criticism against her is labeled child abuse and the persons criticizing her are called “haters”. If she can not answer a question it is “because she is only a child”. – But she can still tell world leaders to do!
She has no scientific background. After telling the world leaders what they should do she receives simple questions at press conferences but she can not even give simple answers. Choosing such a poor representative for climate change naturally has a purpose. The purpose is to promote hatred and division in society.
If the people behind Greta had wanted to convince they would have chosen an older messenger with scientific background that could give good replies to reporters. But to convince the listener is secondary to promoting hatred.
Foreign interests, supported by banks and multinationals, already control politicians (they are f.ex not allowed to talk to the only nationalist party in Sweden, with 18% voters), media (oligarchs form an international network publishing synchronized news) and science (only positive climate change results are given attention).
It does not matter what people vote for, the same government will still be formed. It does not matter what scientists say, only one agenda will be promoted by politicians and news media.
No one needs to be convinced. Now the elite only focuses on keeping the people split up and in conflict. Several areas are involved: feminism, mass immigration, climate, HBTQ …
2. Attacking the government
News media support Greta so they can put pressure on the governments by letting Greta ask why the government is not doing enough about the climate. Greta’s attacks on governments weaken them and make them vulnerable to control by news media in other areas, like in making financial decisions.
Many of today’s big businesses are not forged in competition. Google and Facebook could become dominant in a few years through influx of capital and networking. Using the same methods Greta, having no special qualifications, has become one of the world’s most famous people within one year, “building an international movement by skipping school on Fridays”. This is naturally impossible, she is just a puppet for a global network. Her performance at press conferences, not having a script, has been poor. She has theater training, knowing how to take instructions from a director. She has no scientific training.
Greta, as well as Google and Facebook have not been exposed to competition. They have been promoted by networks and capital influx creating unstable top-down controlled organizations. Greta has been chosen like a socialist leader and she promotes socialism. No one has elected Greta but news media and secret networks have given her a platform to attack democratically elected leaders. Both presidents Trump and Putin are forced to comment on her.
No action is intended to be taken against “climate change”. No reduction of consumption will ever occur. All measures are said to start in 10-30 years. Not now. The elite does not believe in climate change. It is an issue constructed to blackmail politicians
Greta’s task is not to reduce consumption. Her task is to influence politicians.
Greta’s socialist backers tell politicians: Unless you let the banks and multinationals run the country, we will send Greta for you. She will say you are a climate criminal. The media will rub this in. Then you are a goner.
The climate issue is not promoted to reduce emissions. It is promoted to blackmail democratically chosen leaders in other areas. Of course, Greta and her backers are not democratically chosen but still try to control nations.
Other authorities are broken down in a similar way:
Greta advocates school strike to undermine the schooling system and the authority of the teachers. (But Greta’s “school strike” is a fraud. She lies outright about it. She never went on strike. School gave her permission to study at home on Fridays. But she still demands from other children to sacrifice their future by giving up education!) Her message makes students revolt against their teachers.
Greta tells her parents how to travel and not go by air. In doing so she undermines the authority of the parents.
Greta mobilizes young people against the older, utilizing the emotional side of young people in a youth revolt.
“I want you to panic“
The climate doomsday scenario will create panic, especially among young people and make them more susceptible to the propaganda in her message. It will also make the news flow around Greta seem more relevant and even insignificant details will keep up the interest around her.
4. Supranational control
Greta’s propaganda often emphasizes that world leaders do not “do enough” about the climate issue. This would mean that stronger mechanisms for supranational control of nations are needed.
The dark, globalist forces behind Greta have no intent to save the world. On the contrary they try to break down national borders, disrupt the social system and create conflict between groups. In this chaos, news media can rule by supporting some groups at the expense of others.
5. Hiding politics as an environmental issue
School children are ordered to go on mandatory school strike for the environment. In fact they are made political activists for socialism and globalization. HBTQ activism is used in the same way.
The international news media network lets almost no true criticism of Greta be widely known. The few critical voices heard are decoys trying to turn the attention away from how Greta’s message paves the way for socialism. Like talking about carbon dioxide taxation. Or like connecting criticism to less pleasant people, like violent, racist car-reporter Jeremy Clarkson or similar.
Greta has not been elected by any organization. She has not been chosen in competition with anyone else. She has been selected according to socialist principles. The same is true for the objectives of her message – To take control from elected world leaders.
* Feminism attributes natural differences between the sexes to “oppression” which creates conflicts between men and women.
* Mass immigration is used to create ethnic conflicts.
* Demands from HBTQ-groups are promoted in order to pressure governments to fulfill these demand.
* Biological psychiatrists use diagnoses like ADHD to create advocacy groups. Greta is also diagnosed in this way. The diagnosis Asperger will also classify individuals with independent thinking as suffering from disease.
Regarding all these groups, news media can pressure governments for “not doing enough”, using Greta Thunberg’s words.
Actual problems, like some environmental issues, f.ex. the hole in the ozone layer must be solved and everyone agrees on this. Therefore they do not cause conflict and can not be used for creating hatred in the population.
TRANSLATE THIS PAGE:
03.1.001.003: 003 Greta Thunberg (001)
A few earlier posts: (scroll down list)
2017 12 12 Earlier: IOK saknar bevis – Internationella Olympiska Kommittén stänger av Ryssland utan bevis
2017 12 15 Earlier: Destabilisering genom invandring
2017 12 18 Earlier: Destabilisering genom feminism och HBTQ
2017 12 25 Earlier: Geopolitisk krigföring – Media/USA attackerar Europa med flyktingar. The enemy within. Weapons of Mass Migration
2018 03 01 Earlier: Tesla, Ubuntu/Linux – self destructive moles & Google, Facebook – political control mechanisms
2018 03 10 Earlier: The terrorists’ objectives
2018 04 02 Earlier: UN obstructs murder investigation – UN supports an illegal regime. The true reason why Catalán and Sharp were killed.
2018 04 22 Earlier: The Iraq war 2003 was built on fake evidence. / So far, no accusations of chemical warfare have been proven true. / Also the war on IS was built on fake evidence.
2018 04 25 Earlier: Why only few air crash investigations are accurate. – Passengers lives are at an unnecessary risk.
2018 04 27 Earlier: The Cold War and other anti-Russian activities. The image of conflict; The useful enemy
2018 05 01 Earlier: Journalist wounded by IS ?
2018 05 10 Earlier: Who owns the news media
2018 05 22 Earlier: False flag awards
2018 05 30 Earlier: Fake news
2018 08 30 Earlier: Soros’ funds used to influence Swedish politics
2018 09 05 Earlier: Control of the Internet, Google, troll farms
2018 09 06 Earlier: Quotes
2018 09 07 Earlier: Feeding frenzy, the media monopoly disposes of politicians that do not follow the agenda
2018 09 08 Earlier: The media monopoly sells outdated technology to the Swedish gov’t @ SEK 10 bn.
2018 09 09 Earlier: All parties unite to refuse party SD posts as chairman according to election results.
2018 09 10 Earlier: News media gives birth to a political party – Ny Demokrati
2019 02 01 Earlier: Bilderberg calling the shots: Center party is hi-jacked and Liberal party is ordered to self-exterminate.
2019 02 01 Earlier: Elections 2018: Globalist parties pretended to have different opinions. Collaborate to favor large corporations at the expense of workers.
2019 04 12 Earlier: Ola Bini, Arjen Kamphuis connection
2019 04 14 Earlier: Wikileaks, Julian Assange and Ola Bini are likely American agents.
2019 08 10 Earlier: Edward Snowden – US operative
2019 10 10Earlier: Greta Thunberg‘s true, dark motives
Table of Contents (in English)
Massmedia och demokratin
News media and the democracy]