Greta Thunberg’s true, dark motives

 

The true, dark motives of the people behind Greta Thunberg

Greta Thunberg is backed by socialists. Her basic message is to spread hate, conflict and disruption among people and to destabilize governments to make them susceptible to control by news media and other international networks.

Surprisingly Greta requires nothing from neither industry nor common people. EV travel is $2/10k, a Tesla is $100.000. Common people do not need to reduce flying or share commuting. Airline CEO says business is hard because of Greta, but the company shows large profit.

Greta only scolds politicians for not doing enough. And they applaud her for that! They want to do more. This means they will raise taxes and give up control to European Union. Climate alarmists claim that only organizations larger than nations can “save the planet”. This is a way to pave the way for socialism, globalism and the New World Order.
Greta puts pressure on governments by telling them to solve the climate crisis. A crisis which does not exist but is a constructed problem. To reduce CO2 as Greta wants society to be turned back to Stone Age. This can never be done so politicians only do lip service. Any politician not obeying news media in other fields will be called out as climate crook. Neither can a politician try to follow Greta’s agenda because she just talks about crisis, but never about concrete means to solve it. So any politician trying to follow her agenda will be accused by the press to solve the problem wrongly. And turning back society to stone age will make the politician unpopular. Therefore the climate crisis will always continue to be an unsolved problem, making the politician weak and under control by the press.

Like refugees the climate frenzy is directed towards Europe. In Europe taxes will be redirected to the EU.

Greta is also incompetent and ignorant. News media suddenly appointed a 15 year old girl to be the world’s most prominent climate authority, even though she had never been interested in the subject before. She has theater class training and can perform dramatic speeches. She is very poor off script. Basically she knows no more than any of us (including this blog author) did when we were 15. (When this is written Greta recently turned 17.) She is just an ordinary kid manipulated by globalists.

16 year old Greta Thunberg tells world leaders what to do. She has multiple psychiatric diagnoses and skips school systematically. When in school, she demands special assistance.

This composite photo will make the viewer believe that Greta scolds Trump. But in fact she considers talking to the US president “a waste of time”. This is just a way of sparing the US from her criticism. Scolding Trump also increases the gap between young girls and older white men. This is part of the climate agenda.


Within one year, a 16 year old girl, without other qualifications than being an activist, becomes leader of a global climate movement and is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The role of her famous parents and their connections to an advertising agency have been pointed out elsewhere.

Ingmar Rentzhog, advertiser promoting Greta
Luisa-Marie Neubauer, One Foundation (co-founders Bill Gates and George Soros) [ image from: Nya Tider ]

Connections to Gates and Soros exist, see the illustration above. [ -1-, -2- ] Luisa-Marie Neubauer, One Foundation, also co-initiated Fridays For Future (one part of “Greta’s” movement) and also picked up the “Children’s peace prize” for Thunberg.

@GretaThunberg scolds politicians and exhorts ordinary people but *says nothing* about oil producers, car manufacturers, airline industry … (her true masters)
@Snowleopard222 Twitter

Greta Thunberg has training as an actress but no scientific background. Her over acting during the speech in the UN shows that she is an actress giving a performance.

Experts and governments have not yet been able to come to a conclusion regarding the global warming theory. But why is Greta promoted to this high degree?

Governments have been able to address previous environmental issues, like f.ex the hole in the ozone layer and nuclear power. Why is the climate issue not approached in the same methodical way, using experts, governments and if needed referendums? Instead activism and discussions among people are supposed to resolve a complex scientific and political problem! Activism and discussions among people are important but must also be followed by government action. Why is Greta Thunberg’s activism promoted in extreme ways but governments do not act? Who benefits from Thunberg’s activism?

Today many countries are no longer independent. They are controlled by an international network. This network controls the decisions of governments through, among other mechanisms, news media and supranational organizations, like the European Union. This is clearly seen by f.ex. the difficulties for The United Kingdom to leave the EU (“Brexit”) or by forming a government in Sweden 2018 since the parties were under order not to talk to a nationalist party which received a significant share of the votes.

Greta Thunberg’s rise to fame is entirely based on being a tool for her backers’ globalist agenda. In a socialist manner she was picked by the elite for her connections and acting abilities. She and her environmental protection organization was never tested in competition with anyone else but simply promoted by news media.

Major Swedish daily Aftonbladet reported about her already the first day she “went on strike”.

A young girl with psychiatric diagnoses was chosen since anyone criticizing her message can falsely be labeled a “hater”. Some have even compared the “spin” behind Greta and the climate theory to that of the Nazis.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” — Joseph Goebbels, nazi minister of propaganda (Image: top nazi Heinrich Himmler w/ daughter Gudrun)

Background

A 15-year-old with relational problems, psychiatric diagnoses also demanding special assistance skips school on Fridays to create an international environmental movement! Her only plan is to sit on the street with a sign. She has never done anything similar before and her performance at press conferences is poor. But now it is claimed she has written a string of professional speeches. She is showered with awards. Her statements are considered an absolute truth by all media.

This is naturally a “perfect storm” planned by media and PR-consultants for a long time. F.ex this girl does not have the background to write these professional speeeches having political undertones.

S:t Greta – the prophet

A young girl is a symbol of innocence. Greta is a vegan and very slim, which symbolize sacrifices she has made for nature and animals. The Christian deacon Anna Ardin has declared that Greta is a prophet. Ardin is also a CIA-agent according to her own Twitter and most likely also according to her own actions, both before and during the Assange case.

A tattoo strongly influenced by images of the virgin Mary, complete with a halo.


Greta’s ghostwriters let Greta express herself in terms of “I want you to do …” when she issues her dogmatic directives. This would not be expected according to Swedish equality culture. She would have been expected to say “we all should …” or “the only solution for nature is if we …”

One model the influencers behind Greta have used is probably the Pythia or the Oracle of Delphi. She was a young virgin speaking for the God Apollo.

Hiding a political message behind a young girl makes for strange argumentation. Greta dictates orders to world leaders, but if someone asks how to implement them, she or her followers say she can know since she is only a child!
In forums some posters make references to the Bergman movie The seventh seal. The title refers to the Book of Revelations. On Judgement Day a new world order will be created – a clear reference to the globalist New World Order being compared to the building of the christian kingdom of God, on earth.

As Christ broke a new seal (seal) and continued to roll up the book one more piece, John revealed further pieces of the breaking of the social and political development that would take place on our planet, as well as the closing sequence of events that Jesus declared would lead to ” the end of time, “that is, the end of this age, the return of Jesus to earth, and the establishment of a worldwide government – the kingdom of God on earth.
(Google translate from Swedish)

bibelfrågan


Greta Thunberg’s agenda works through several mechanisms:

 

1. Divide and conquer

Greta’s extreme activism without sufficient scientific foundation will divide the population into “alarmists”, supporting her and “deniers” asking for more, scientific evaluation of the global warming theory. Splitting up a population is an efficient way to rule it. The population becomes weak when it is consumed by internal conflicts. Alarmists will support the climate agenda and in turn receive support from news media.

Greta’s hyperemotional speech in the UN without strict scientific base makes her an object for criticism. Any criticism against her is labeled child abuse and the persons criticizing her are called “haters”. If she can not answer a question it is “because she is only a child”. – But she can still tell world leaders to do!

Greta was instructed to give a hyperemotional speech in the UN. This will not convince listeners in neither a scientific nor an emotional way. The lack of scientific foundation only serves to create hatred towards her, further increasing the gap between “alarmists” and “deniers”.

She has no scientific background. After telling the world leaders what they should do she receives simple questions at press conferences but she can not even give simple answers. Choosing such a poor representative for climate change naturally has a purpose. The purpose is to promote hatred and division in society.

If the people behind Greta had wanted to convince they would have chosen an older messenger with scientific background that could give good replies to reporters. But to convince the listener is secondary to promoting hatred.

Before Greta travels around the US she is said to use an Electric Vehicle. But during the entire, highly publicized trip, only one, strangely cropped, pay-wall image of Greta in an EV appears. No first hand information indicates she travels EV. A video shows her travelling a 276 hp, 3.3L V6 KIA Sedona and she is said to go by train which usually are diesel in the US.

She receives maximum support but it has been decided that she should not follow her own agenda of environment friendly travel. This discrepancy is created to further increase criticism towards her and create division among people.

Foreign interests, supported by banks and multinationals, already control politicians (they are f.ex not allowed to talk to the only nationalist party in Sweden, with 18% voters), media (oligarchs form an international network publishing synchronized news) and science (only positive climate change results are given attention).

It does not matter what people vote for, the same government will still be formed. It does not matter what scientists say, only one agenda will be promoted by politicians and news media.

No one needs to be convinced. Now the elite only focuses on keeping the people split up and in conflict. Several areas are involved: feminism, mass immigration, climate, HBTQ …

The conflicts Greta’s masters instruct her to create are connected to gender.

Greta scolds the elite and they applaud her! (UK MPs)

 


Greta’s backers want to split up society. Talk about unity is false. Greta attends Ellen DeGeneres talk show. Like Greta, Ellen is (or used to be) a vegan. Ellen is gay. Greta says it would be a waste of time to meet Trump. A completely wrong thing. Greta ought to make use of the Pr-advantage in meeting the president of the US, if possible. Greta is instructed to say this in order to create hatred towards her.

Thus two female vegans (one former) meet. At least one is gay and the other consider meeting the president of the US a waste if time! We are gradually taught to connect values: woman, gay, vegan, climate-activism. These are pitched against an older man like Trump. We are taught which values are good and belong together and which to ignore.


2. Attacking the government

News media support Greta so they can put pressure on the governments by letting Greta ask why the government is not doing enough about the climate. Greta’s attacks on governments weaken them and make them vulnerable to control by news media in other areas, like in making financial decisions.


The differences between most political parties are small nowadays. They are all under influence from news media and other international networks. Greta’s message that governments are doing too little means that governments must be controlled. The EU must be strengthened. Governments weakened. Countries weakened. Borders are broken down by mass immigration. She is part of a process trying to create a new Soviet Union, only this time on an even larger scale.

Real environmental problems, such as the ozone hole, are solved without significant delay. But regarding the climate, governments do not take extremely costly measures because science is not clear.

Greta’s task is to scold governments so that they are weakened and the EU and other organizations can govern the governments.

Greta doesn’t care about the environment. She doesn’t even dare ask people to do shared commuting, consume less over Christmas or ask them to take the train home over Christmas. [2019]

She acts politically. Her task is to weaken governments so that they can be controlled from the outside. She is acting to create a new Soviet Union.

Greta’s environmental message is busted by only attacking Western countries. Major CO2 emitters like India and China are spared from her scolding or 100.000 Africans born every day! (2020)

Her attacks spare businesses. She attacks the tennis player Roger Federer. He is sponsored by Credit Suisse which invests in Australian coal mines. But Greta’s protest will not be heard in Australia. It will just make her own activism less popular, like her companions Extinction Rebellion when they vandalize cars or similar.


Today’s big business has gone socialist and multinational corporations participate in breaking down borders to weaken governments. Today “woke billionaires” [-1- -2-] like Soros are socialist.

Many of today’s big businesses are not forged in competition. Google and Facebook could become dominant in a few years through influx of capital and networking. Using the same methods Greta, having no special qualifications, has become one of the world’s most famous people within one year, “building an international movement by skipping school on Fridays”. This is naturally impossible, she is just a puppet for a global network. Her performance at press conferences, not having a script, has been poor. She has theater training, knowing how to take instructions from a director. She has no scientific training.

Greta, as well as Google and Facebook have not been exposed to competition. They have been promoted by networks and capital influx creating unstable top-down controlled organizations. Greta has been chosen like a socialist leader and she promotes socialism. No one has elected Greta but news media and secret networks have given her a platform to attack democratically elected leaders. Both presidents Trump and Putin are forced to comment on her.

No action is intended to be taken against “climate change”. No reduction of consumption will ever occur. All measures are said to start in 10-30 years. Not now. The elite does not believe in climate change. It is an issue constructed to blackmail politicians

Greta’s task is not to reduce consumption. Her task is to influence politicians.

Greta’s socialist backers tell politicians: Unless you let the banks and multinationals run the country, we will send Greta for you. She will say you are a climate criminal. The media will rub this in. Then you are a goner.

The climate issue is not promoted to reduce emissions. It is promoted to blackmail democratically chosen leaders in other areas. Of course, Greta and her backers are not democratically chosen but still try to control nations.

Gretas message is highly inconsistent. She does not fly, she forbids her parents to fly! The term “flying shame” is strongly connected to her. But she also says that other people do not need to travel like she does.

I’m not traveling like this because I want everyone to do so,” she said, speaking of crossing the Atlantic in a catamaran. “I’m doing this to sort of send a message that it is impossible to live sustainable today and that needs to change. It needs to become much easier. We can’t require from everyone to rely on people like this to sail you across an ocean, that is absurd.”
knoe

This is because her message does not wish for real change. She is only a puppet set to exhort politicans in general.

Other authorities are broken down in a similar way:

Greta advocates school strike to undermine the schooling system and the authority of the teachers. Her message makes students revolt against their teachers. (But Greta’s “school strike” is a fraud. She lies outright about it. She never went on strike. School gave her permission to study at home on Fridays. But she still demands from other children to sacrifice their future by giving up education! In the same way she and news media lie about how she allegedly travels North America in “Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Tesla” whereas in fact she has been recorded using a petrol driven KIA. She seem to have had one photo-op in a parked Tesla.) Social foras connected to MSM remove criticism of these lies without reason. Criticism of Greta is labeled hate, like criticisms of mass immigration, racism and of feminism – misogyny.

Greta’s true message is revolt against authorities. In this case against “eltern generation” (German: the parents’ generation).

Greta tells her parents how to travel and not go by air. In doing so she undermines the authority of the parents.

Greta mobilizes young people against the older, utilizing the emotional side of young people in a youth revolt.

 

3. Panic

“I want you to panic

The climate doomsday scenario will create panic, especially among young people and make them more susceptible to the propaganda in her message. It will also make the news flow around Greta seem more relevant and even insignificant details will keep up the interest around her.

“Our house is on fire.”

The climate message is focused on an alleged severity of the problem, not around measures that need to be taken. Greta says “Our house is in fire. I want you to panic.” But she does not say what should be done by individuals. She only says that everyone should do ‘as much as they can’. But this is so vague that it will even increase the panic.

The Corona (Covid-19) pandemic spring 2020 shows similarities. Media report the seriousness of the matter which is vastly exaggerated. But media and health authorities do not take action. No medical resources are deployed for the endemic. Corona testing is not even available in the Swedish capital, Stockholm except for hospital in patients. No advice is given on who should apply self quarantine and who should see medicare.

Greta also self quarantines but under strange ciecumstances. She does not tell why she does not appear at a meeting except for ‘personal reasons’. Only later does she tell she believes she has had Corona. All adding to rumours and speculation.

This media/authority focus on crisis and not on alleviation is an attack of psychological warfare on the population both for the climate and virus matters.

The attacks will destabilize a country and make it weak. The attacks are greatly carried out by news media governed by international networks governed by the USA.

A weakened country can more easily be controlled by the intenational networks.

 

4. Control of nations

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/27/greta-thunberg-justin-trudeau-meeting-climate-strikes

Greta’s propaganda often emphasizes that world leaders do not “do enough” about the climate issue. This would mean that stronger mechanisms for supranational control of nations are needed.

The dark, globalist forces behind Greta have no intent to save the world. On the contrary they try to break down national borders, disrupt the social system and create conflict between groups. In this chaos, news media can rule by supporting some groups at the expense of others.

Quite simply, the climate movement is a way to promote socialism.

December 12, 2019, Greta just held a speech at COP 25 in Madrid. As usual she speaks in very broad terms. She dares not tell people the obvious: to reduce consumption, in particular over Christmas.

She is said to write her own speeches. This is highly unlikely. She had social problems and needed support teacher. She is 16 years old and has never been an activist before. Her initial plan was to sit down on the street with a sign. When she has had to reply to questions without manuscript, she often has big difficulties. To sum up: She does not have the ability to write this series of professional speeches.

Paid Internet trolls defend her in a curious way. If a person questions the climate theory, trolls say the person hates Greta! (A thin, 16 y.o. girl with diagnoses was chosen to avoid criticism.)

 
5. US attack on Europe

The US is already attacking Europe by mass immigration of “refugees” from US warfare. The climate is another form of attack. Strong European countries are brought down by climate regulations, often enforced through the EU.

Greta’s connection to the US was f.ex seen during her trip to the UN. After her speech in New York, when media focus was still on her, she immediately went to Canada and held one of her biggest meetings ever, in Montreal. She scolded Canadian PM, Trudeau. After some time she continued to the US. Later she held some meetings there, but most publicized was probably positive news how she was given membership in an Indian tribe during interesting rituals.

The 16 y.o. activist also says that it would be a “waste of time” to talk to the president of the US, Trump!! She says that in order to spare the US from her criticism.

The US does not take responsibility for it’s refugees. Now it has appointed Trump who goes light on climate matters and wants to build a wall against refugees.

Gretas criticism mainly focus on Europe. But US, Russia, China, India, the Arab (oil producing) world are spared. Latin America is barely on the news media map, in Europe.

When Greta criticized oil production in one article, she mentioned Norway and Canada, but not the Middle East!

Her speech in US congress was much milder than her speech in EU parliament. What is mostly broadcast from the US is how Greta herself has to answer questions from members of congress.

In US congress Greta was asked what it feels when “other sailboats than hers throw more waste”. She should have answered that the US is the worlds largest CO2 emitter per person and scolded the US congress, like she does elsewhere. But she is controlled from the US and does not criticize them harshly. To save Trump from criticism she says “it is a waste of time to talk to him”!

The US 2020 primaries have started. Sanders talk about big spending on “Green Deal”. But he and Biden repeatedly make fools of themselves during the campaign, in order not to be elected.

CO2 regulations are mainly implemented by EU. Cuts in CO2 have not yet been legislated about. A distant 2050 goal has been set. But EU has been given tools of power to instruct countries how to act. The climate is a wide subject and many areas fall under EU control.

US attack Europe in many ways, like MSM, EU and refugees. MSM control politicians and thereby also EU. Moving decisions away from people to EU makes it even easier to control matters from the outside. EU regulations tie down countries. Brexit has shown that a free UK would be a threat to Europe. Merkel and Barnier has expressed this directly.

What we read about US liberalism is US export only. We read CNN, MSM. We read about Democrats impeaching Trump. We har shown bits of California and Hollywood. But this is not how the US is run, from the east coast. See: US liberalism is for export. US 2020 elections are rigged (Sanders inviting an Iranian ayatollah to speak at meeting, Biden swearing and behaving generally poorly to supporters, pretending to forget former president Obamas name (under which Biden recently served as VP for 8 years).

 

6. European Union

Greta speaks to the EU parliament, March 2019. They have agreed on a new climate law that is to be signed by member states. The only legally binding CO2 target is for 2050. After 2023 EU can audit member countries a d after 2030 give “recommendations”.

A target 30 years into the future is very vague. But already after 2030 the EU can issue recommendations (warnings) to member states not following the agenda. EU will be in control of how and who makes the CO2 audits and how the results will be interpreted.

Greta therefore does not want specific goals. She scolds the parliament in general for not acting earlier. But Greta does not want anyone to act. She wants countries to break the agenda so EU-commission can use this to threaten the countries in other fields using the climate audits.

The climate theories are vague and no country is willing to follow the costly climate agenda. So the EU-commission can threaten them with a climate audit with vague criteria. This becomes an instrument of power for the EU commission.

Gretas task is to keep the panic going.
The Independent

The US, India, China, Middle East do not take climate action. Neither do individual countries like f.ex Sweden or other European countries. The only part taking action for the climate is the EU. They can use climate theory to control individual countries. They need Greta to keep the climate hysteria going. (The EU also seems to be under influence of multinationals and the US.)

The European Union is the only entity spending other’s money, so they want to spend more.

It is highly significant that Greta does not attack India, China, Russia, USA, not even Sweden. She sits outside the Swedish parliament. She does not talk to president Trump because the 16 y.o. considers it “a waste of time”!

Greta’s message is connected to strengthening and expanding the European Union.

 

7. Christian connection

The vagueness of the climate agenda resembles the Christian message that has formed the Western world. No clear evidence is available for either. They are cases of believing.

If clear evidence was available leaders would act, like the ozone hole. But now all action is compared to a vague distant goal, giving the leader the possibility to personally decide who is a good believer.

If a law was passed how much we mist reduce CO2 this year, the power of the leadership would be lost. It works like antidoping. – Surprisingly no one wants to reduce doping. They all wish to punish athletes from countries they dislike.

The same people are involved. Christianity stsrted in the Middle East. Climate theories are promoted by Jewish owned newspapers.

Christian deacon Ardin promotes Greta to prophet. Ardin is CIA, as has been described elsewhere in this blog.

8. Masquerading politics as an environmental issue

School children are ordered to go on mandatory school strike for the environment. In fact they are made political activists for socialism and globalization. HBTQ activism is used in the same way.

The international news media network lets almost no true criticism of Greta be widely known. The few critical voices heard are decoys trying to turn the attention away from how Greta’s message paves the way for socialism. Like talking about carbon dioxide taxation. Or like connecting criticism to less pleasant people, like violent, racist car-reporter Jeremy Clarkson or similar.


Greta and Luisa Neubauer (who has worked for Soros’ & Gates’ One Foundation) write:

… action must be powerful and wide-ranging. After all, the climate crisis is not just about the environment. It is a crisis of human rights, of justice, and of political will. Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression have created and fueled it. We need to dismantle them all. Our political leaders can no longer shirk their responsibilities.
project-syndicate.org


 

9. Socialism

Greta has not been elected by any organization. She has not been chosen in competition with anyone else. She has been selected according to socialist principles. The same is true for the objectives of her message – To take control from elected world leaders.

News media promote Greta Thunberg and the global warming issue. This is not done to save the planet. On the contrary, news media and other networks do this in order to create conflict that will destabilize governments and make them susceptible to influence by news media. Other groups are used in the same way:

* Feminism attributes natural differences between the sexes to “oppression” which creates conflicts between men and women.

* Mass immigration is used to create ethnic conflicts.

* Demands from HBTQ-groups are promoted in order to pressure governments to fulfill these demand.

* Biological psychiatrists use diagnoses like ADHD to create advocacy groups. Greta is also diagnosed in this way. The diagnosis Asperger will also classify individuals with independent thinking as suffering from disease.

The same methods to classify dissidents to the system as mentally ill were used in the Soviet Union.

Greta has probably been told to fake tics in this picture. If she had these involuntarily spasms, she would not have been allowed to appear in the UN.

TURIN, ITALY – DECEMBER 13: Greta Thunberg attends Fridays For Future Strike on December 13, 2019 in Turin, Italy. (Photo by Giorgio Perottino/Getty Images)

Regarding all these groups, news media can pressure governments for “not doing enough”, using Greta Thunberg’s words.

Actual problems, like some environmental issues, f.ex. the hole in the ozone layer must be solved and everyone agrees on this. Therefore they do not cause conflict and can not be used for creating hatred in the population.

10. Three possible interpretations

1. Self-styled climate activist

This is impossible. A 15 (now 17) year old school pupil can not reach her level if success within a year, become person of the year, feature on the cover of Time and Rolling Stone. Speak in the UN, US Congress, EU etc She is not invited to the World Economic Forum to teach anything. She was invited to have publicity.

2. Actress

Greta comes from a family of artists and singers. She has theater training. Her saga has so far been a Cinderella story. The alleged almost mute girl that became the voice of a world wide climate movement.

This blog has so far considered this alternative as the true story – A child actress given a role to inspire other girls to join the climate movement.

But after a while you would then expect her to undergo the same transformation as the heroines of some Hollywood movies – Let down her hair and become a verbal, cute climate princess.

But lately, in the EU and on the cover of the Rolling Stone (graphic) she looked even more dismal than before.

Why is this? A third interpretation must be taken into account:

3. Her parents sold her to the Devil

Was Greta’s health ruined to be cast in a role to fit the agenda of the international press?

She is much thinner than her sister. Family claims Greta is stopping them from flying and eating meat:

Environmentalist Greta Thunberg Made Her Parents Feel Guilty For Eating Meat And Dairy

But a young girl can not control her family.

Her Internet supporters usually says that Greta must take care of herself. But she was 15 when she became famous and is still only 17. Her parents are responsible.

Mother’s book try to focus on how she forces Greta to eat more, maybe it is the reverse, she has been slimming Greta.

It is possible Greta could have been honed for this role, by her parents, since she was very young. She could have been taught or forced to eat little, having disastrous consequences for her health. Her diagnoses could even have been used to have amphetamine prescribed which would further make her thin and also short.

Psychiatric treatment is under the influence of international networks. How you look on a anorectic patients is a political matter. Psychiatrists are encouraged to focus on the patient and disregard the social context. Anorectic patients are put in a bubble and their families are not considered. They are “treated” by infusions and encouraged to eat more. All to disregard the influence of the family. (Not letting the parents take responsibility is part of a process destabilizing society. In Bjärred mental illness in parents led to their children being diagnosed with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis finally the parents murdered the children “out of mercy” and finally committed suicide. The case was never investigated.)

Greta looked the worst during her major appearances, in the UN and lately in the EU.

@GretaThunberg looked more sick than ever in #EU. Has G been abused by dieting to fit a news media role of Climate Saint. Her diagnoses might even have led to amphetamine treatment, further …
#ClimateStrike
#FridaysForFuture #schoolstrike4climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateChange https://t.co/cnPjOldQEa

… further slimming her and making her short. Did Greta’s parents sell her to the Devil for eternal fame? Was her health sacrificed to create a look that will never leave our minds?

Twitter

But if you look further on the pictures from the EU parliament she is acting.


Refusing to shake a man’s hand. As this blog has described, the climate agenda unfortunately promotes conflict between men and women by putting women before men. Many pictures from the EU show that.

EU segregates men and women. Climate is for women.

June 2020: Greta’s mother has been the driving force behind putting Greta in this role. She has long had a left political interest. She, like Greta’s advisor prof. Rockström have since long criticized Swedish nationalist party SD. Her mother, a singer, is on the cover of newspaper Vi in 2011. Rockström is also featured in the same edition. The article about the mother focuses on how much air travel she does in her work. (She later claimed she had to give up flying because her daughter forced her to.)


Sweden and Nordic countries

After receiving an enormous amount of prizes Greta surprisingly declines a prize from the Nordic Council. Strengthening countries through cooperation is against her global revolutionary agenda. Her backers do not want cooperation. They want conflict to make control possible.

Greta is a poisoned chalice of the worst kind for Sweden. That is why media protect her so intensly. She appeals to our natural pride for Swedish success. But the more we promote her, the stronger her sowing of the dragons teeth will become in school strike, youth revolt, attack against democratically elected politicians, supranational control …

The more we support this Swedish celebrity, the more we destroy our country. Horrifying plans are set in motion against Sweden and other countries.

Greta even criticized a Danish sewer plant for releasing waste water in an area close to Sweden. A completley normal procedure when rebuilding.


@GretaThunberg Tweets pic sitting on floor
https://t.co/LptPNC7mxE
German rlwy responds that she traveled ** 1st class **
https://t.co/NldlPoxfRp
Just don’t trust her.
#ClimateStrike
#ClimateCrisisStrike #FridaysForFuture #schoolstrike4climate #ClimateCrisis #ClimateChange

Twitter, Snowleopard


wwr: 69753638
Julrecept:

Ta en vanlig nedbantad pluggis/teaterapa. Strö bokstäver över henne. Låt henne skälla ut politiker och se till att folk tror att alla äldre män hatar sådana barn.

Vrid upp mediemegafonen på högsta volym.

Alla fortsätter att flyga och konsumera.

Rör upp jordens shitstorm runt ingenting. Festligt!

Hem och fira jul. Festen över.

Vad blir vi serverade nästa år? Assange mot kvinnomaffian och de hemska krigsförbrytarna USA? (Ingen dömd på Assange s.k. läckor.)


Where is Greta going?

Surprisingly Assange image has changed in media. From free speech hero to a sex offender that got away. The blog aurhor had expected Greta to be a Cinderella story. If you believe in the climate you will be saved. But that part hasn’t come yet. Mars 2020, on the cover of the Rolling Stone, still not a positive slant of the image.


Is Greta aware?

Greta is presented as the young girl that controls her family and makes UN, EU-parliament
and World Exonomic Forum listen. (But in the US Congress she mostly replies to questions.)

This is not possible. The elite control Greta.

How aware of this is she? Can she shed the role and relax when at home? The blog is yet undecided. She seems to have started as a vegan very young (?). She is much smaller than her sister. Many believe the hard diet and training for her performances have inflicted damage on her body and personality. Is this a case of child abuse? Probably.


 

TRANSLATE THIS PAGE:

A few earlier posts:    (scroll down list)

2017 12 09 Earlier: Trump om Jerusalem – den verkliga orsaken till Trumps uttalande funnen

2017 12 12 Earlier: IOK saknar bevis – Internationella Olympiska Kommittén stänger av Ryssland utan bevis

2017 12 15 Earlier: Destabilisering genom invandring

2017 12 18 Earlier: Destabilisering genom feminism och HBTQ

2017 12 25 Earlier: Geopolitisk krigföring – Media/USA attackerar Europa med flyktingar. The enemy within. Weapons of Mass Migration

2018 03 01 Earlier: Tesla, Ubuntu/Linux – self destructive moles & Google, Facebook – political control mechanisms

2018 03 10 Earlier: The terrorists’ objectives

2018 04 02 Earlier: UN obstructs murder investigation – UN supports an illegal regime. The true reason why Catalán and Sharp were killed.

2018 04 10 Earlier: Bjärred-case. Politically correct psychiatry exterminates a whole family?

2018 04 22 Earlier: The Iraq war 2003 was built on fake evidence. / So far, no accusations of chemical warfare have been proven true. / Also the war on IS was built on fake evidence.

2018 04 25 Earlier: Why only few air crash investigations are accurate. – Passengers lives are at an unnecessary risk.

2018 04 27 Earlier: The Cold War and other anti-Russian activities. The image of conflict; The useful enemy

2018 05 01 Earlier: Journalist wounded by IS ?

2018 05 10 Earlier: Who owns the news media

2018 05 22 Earlier: False flag awards

2018 05 30 Earlier: Fake news

2018 08 30 Earlier: Soros’ funds used to influence Swedish politics

2018 09 05 Earlier: Control of the Internet, Google, troll farms

2018 09 06 Earlier: Quotes

2018 09 07 Earlier: Feeding frenzy, the media monopoly disposes of politicians that do not follow the agenda

2018 09 08 Earlier: The media monopoly sells outdated technology to the Swedish gov’t @ SEK 10 bn.

2018 09 09 Earlier: All parties unite to refuse party SD posts as chairman according to election results.

2018 09 10 Earlier: News media gives birth to a political party – Ny Demokrati

2019 02 01 Earlier: Bilderberg calling the shots: Center party is hi-jacked and Liberal party is ordered to self-exterminate.

2019 02 01 Earlier: Elections 2018: Globalist parties pretended to have different opinions. Collaborate to favor large corporations at the expense of workers.

2019 04 12 Earlier: Ola Bini, Arjen Kamphuis connection

2019 04 14 Earlier: Wikileaks, Julian Assange and Ola Bini are likely American agents.

2019 08 10 Earlier: Edward Snowden – US operative

2019 10 10 Earlier: Greta Thunberg‘s true, dark motives

2019 11 26 Earlier: Arjen Kamphuis‘ disappearance

2019 12 01 Earlier: Are the Iranian ayatollahs CIA-agents?

2019 12 08 Earlier: Obama tries to break US self confidence by cutting the space program.

2019 12 10 Earlier: Elon Musk, SpaceX Starlink network is fake. Starlink is mass surveillance.

2019 12 14 Earlier: Elon Musk is intentionally a poor role model, to destroy youth values.

2019 12 19 Earlier: Neil Farage: Parties like SverigeDemokraterna (SD) become corrupt in the European Union.

2020 01 20 Earlier: The European Union threatens w/ bank blockade to make United Kingdom to follow EU rules.

2020 01 22 Earlier: The scare factor

2020 01 25 Earlier: Climate gender conflicts

2020 01 26 Earlier: Are Starlink spy satellites?

2020 01 27 Earlier: Is Mars rover “Curiosity” fake??

2020 02 29 Earlier: Assange extradition trial

2020 03 08 Earlier: US liberal chaos is only for export.

2020 03 12 Earlier: US elections 2020 are rigged.

2020 03 25 Earlier: Corona & climate – full panic but no real action taken.

2020 04 06 Earlier: The government/press/elite are less likely to use espionage against other states, but would rather use it against their own people.

2020 04 12 Earlier: fake rebels

2020 04 30 Earlier: Brexit, current status

2020 05 02 Earlier: Elon Musk plays the fool

2020 05 06 Earlier: Fairy tales newspapers compose

2020 05 02 Earlier: Norwegian police never tries to find the missing person

2020 05 22 Earlier: Blackmail the European Union

2020 05 27 Earlier: Send Greta to the European Union to stop Corona recovery. We in Northern Europe are paying for it.

2020 06 10 Earlier: Why SpaceX recovers boosters.

2020 06 11 Earlier: Why the UK can not get a deal with the EU.

2020 06 12 Earlier: Why the media hate Latin America

2020 06 16 Earlier: The Brexit dilemma (1)

2020 06 18 Earlier: Black Lives Matter/All Lives Matter [BLM]

2020 06 20 Earlier: Swedish PM splits Nordic unity for no reason. – He must be under globalist control.

2020 07 05 Earlier: Cross-country skiing champion Marit Bjorgen – a product of the globalist agenda


Table of Contents (in English)

Summary

[keywords:
Massmedia och demokratin
News media and the democracy]

Nästa:

03.1.001.003: 003 Greta Thunberg (002)


Innehållsförteckning:

20.04 Innehållsförteckning, ToC


 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.